Although furosemide is effective in treating the symptoms of both acute and chronic heart failure, it does not provide any predictive advantages.

Drug Management for Chronic Heart Failure: NICE Guidelines

Chronic heart failure is a serious condition that requires proper management to improve patient outcomes. In 2018, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) updated their guidelines on drug management for chronic heart failure. The guidelines recommend first-line therapy with both an ACE-inhibitor and a beta-blocker, with clinical judgement used to determine which one to start first. Second-line therapy involves the use of aldosterone antagonists, which should be monitored for hyperkalaemia. SGLT-2 inhibitors are also increasingly being used to manage heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. Third-line therapy should be initiated by a specialist and may include ivabradine, sacubitril-valsartan, hydralazine in combination with nitrate, digoxin, or cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Other treatments such as annual influenza and one-off pneumococcal vaccines are also recommended.

Overall, the NICE guidelines provide a comprehensive approach to drug management for chronic heart failure. It is important to note that loop diuretics have not been shown to reduce mortality in the long-term, and that ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers have no effect on mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Healthcare professionals should carefully consider the patient’s individual needs and circumstances when determining the appropriate drug therapy for chronic heart failure.

If a patient with tachyarrhythmia has a systolic BP below 90 mmHg, immediate DC cardioversion is necessary. This is because hypotension indicates an unstable tachyarrhythmia that can lead to shock, heart failure, syncope, or myocardial ischemia. Vagal maneuvers and adenosine are not recommended in cases of severe hypotension, and amiodarone is used for pharmacological cardioversion in broad complex tachycardia.

Management of Peri-Arrest Tachycardias

The Resuscitation Council (UK) guidelines for the management of peri-arrest tachycardias have been simplified in the 2015 update. The previous separate algorithms for broad-complex tachycardia, narrow complex tachycardia, and atrial fibrillation have been replaced by a unified treatment algorithm. After basic ABC assessment, patients are classified as stable or unstable based on the presence of adverse signs such as hypotension, pallor, sweating, confusion, or impaired consciousness. If any of these signs are present, synchronised DC shocks should be given, up to a maximum of three shocks.

The treatment following this is based on whether the QRS complex is narrow or broad and whether the rhythm is regular or irregular. For broad-complex tachycardia, a loading dose of amiodarone followed by a 24-hour infusion is given if the rhythm is regular. If the rhythm is irregular, expert help should be sought as it could be due to atrial fibrillation with bundle branch block, atrial fibrillation with ventricular pre-excitation, or torsade de pointes.

For narrow-complex tachycardia, vagal manoeuvres followed by IV adenosine are given if the rhythm is regular. If unsuccessful, atrial flutter is considered, and rate control is achieved with beta-blockers. If the rhythm is irregular, it is likely due to atrial fibrillation, and electrical or chemical cardioversion is considered if the onset is less than 48 hours. Beta-blockers are usually the first-line treatment for rate control unless contraindicated. The full treatment algorithm can be found on the Resuscitation Council website.

For reducing the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the first-line anticoagulation should be a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) such as rivaroxaban. This recommendation is based on a scenario where a patient is found to have AF during a wellbeing check and requires anticoagulation due to the increased risk of thrombosis. Aspirin is not the correct choice as it is an antiplatelet and not an anticoagulant. While dalteparin and enoxaparin are low molecular weight heparins that are often used for VTE prophylaxis, DOACs are preferred first-line for stroke risk reduction in AF. Patients often prefer DOACs as they are available in tablet form.

NICE recommends using the CHA2DS2-VASc score to determine the need for anticoagulation in patients with any history of AF. The ORBIT scoring system should be used to assess bleeding risk, but anticoagulation should not be withheld solely on the grounds of age or risk of falls. DOACs are now recommended as the first-line anticoagulant for patients with AF, with warfarin used second-line if a DOAC is contraindicated or not tolerated. Aspirin is not recommended for reducing stroke risk in patients with AF.

Medications for Heart Failure: Benefits and Guidelines

Heart failure is a serious condition that requires proper management through medications. Among the drugs commonly used are bisoprolol, bendroflumethiazide, clopidogrel, spironolactone, and diltiazem.

Bisoprolol and an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor are recommended for all heart failure patients as they have been shown to reduce mortality. Bendroflumethiazide and loop diuretics like furosemide can help alleviate symptoms but do not have a mortality benefit. Clopidogrel, on the other hand, is not indicated for heart failure but is used for vascular diseases like NSTEMI and stroke.

Spironolactone is recommended for patients who remain symptomatic despite treatment with an ACE inhibitor and a b blocker. It is also beneficial for those with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) after a myocardial infarction (MI). However, diltiazem should be avoided in heart failure patients.

According to NICE guidelines, b blockers and ACE inhibitors should be given to all LVSD patients unless contraindicated. Spironolactone can be added if symptoms persist. Proper medication management is crucial in improving outcomes for heart failure patients.

Appropriate Laboratory Tests for Cardiovascular Health Check

To assess a patient’s cardiovascular health, various laboratory tests may be conducted. However, the choice of tests should be based on the patient’s symptoms, medical history, and physical examination. In the case of a patient with signs of hyperlipidaemia, a lipid profile would be the most appropriate test to diagnose familial hyperlipidaemia. On the other hand, an ECG would be indicated if there was a family history of sudden death to rule out underlying rhythm issues. A fasting glucose test would not be necessary in this case, but it may be conducted as part of a cardiovascular health check. A full blood count would not aid in the diagnosis of hyperlipidaemia, but it may be conducted if the patient was experiencing chest pain to exclude anaemia as a cause of his symptoms. Lastly, a renal profile would not aid in the diagnosis of familial hyperlipidaemia, but it may be conducted to rule out secondary causes if the patient were hypertensive.

Patients who have AF and stable CVD are typically prescribed anticoagulants while antiplatelets are discontinued. This is because such patients are at risk of stroke, as indicated by their CHADS-VASC score, which takes into account factors such as age, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease. Therefore, the patient in question needs to be treated accordingly. In this case, the patient should discontinue their antiplatelet medication and switch to oral anticoagulant monotherapy.

Managing Combination Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Therapy

With the rise of comorbidity, it is becoming increasingly common for patients to require both antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. However, this combination increases the risk of bleeding and may not be necessary in all cases. While there are no guidelines to cover every scenario, a recent review in the BMJ offers expert opinion on how to manage this situation.

For patients with stable cardiovascular disease who require an anticoagulant, it is recommended that they receive antiplatelet therapy as well. However, if the patient has an indication for an anticoagulant, such as atrial fibrillation, it is best to prescribe anticoagulant monotherapy without the addition of antiplatelets.

In patients who have experienced an acute coronary syndrome or undergone percutaneous coronary intervention, there is a stronger indication for antiplatelet therapy. Typically, patients are given triple therapy (two antiplatelets and one anticoagulant) for four to six months after the event, followed by dual therapy (one antiplatelet and one anticoagulant) for the remaining 12 months. However, the stroke risk in atrial fibrillation varies according to risk factors, so there may be variation in treatment from patient to patient.

For patients who develop venous thromboembolism while on antiplatelets, they will likely be prescribed anticoagulants for three to six months. An ORBIT score should be calculated to determine the risk of bleeding. Patients with a low risk of bleeding may continue taking antiplatelets, while those with an intermediate or high risk of bleeding should consider stopping them.

Overall, managing combination antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy requires careful consideration of the patient’s individual circumstances and risk factors.

Volatile liquid anaesthetics (isoflurane, desflurane, sevoflurane) can cause malignant hyperthermia, a rare genetic disorder that causes skeletal muscle to contract rapidly and can lead to acidosis, increased CO2, and elevated body temperature. This is the likely cause of the patient’s acute deterioration after receiving sevoflurane. Other potential causes, such as cardiac arrest, endobronchial intubation, normal anion gap metabolic acidosis, and spontaneous appendix perforation, do not explain the specific symptoms observed.

Overview of General Anaesthetics

General anaesthetics are drugs used to induce a state of unconsciousness in patients undergoing surgical procedures. There are two main types of general anaesthetics: inhaled and intravenous. Inhaled anaesthetics, such as isoflurane, desflurane, sevoflurane, and nitrous oxide, are administered through inhalation. These drugs work by acting on various receptors in the brain, including GABAA, glycine, NDMA, nACh, and 5-HT3 receptors. Inhaled anaesthetics can cause adverse effects such as myocardial depression, malignant hyperthermia, and hepatotoxicity.

Intravenous anaesthetics, such as propofol, thiopental, etomidate, and ketamine, are administered through injection. These drugs work by potentiating GABAA receptors or blocking NDMA receptors. Intravenous anaesthetics can cause adverse effects such as pain on injection, hypotension, laryngospasm, myoclonus, and disorientation. However, they are often preferred over inhaled anaesthetics in cases of haemodynamic instability.

It is important to note that the exact mechanism of action of general anaesthetics is not fully understood. Additionally, the choice of anaesthetic depends on various factors such as the patient’s medical history, the type of surgery, and the anaesthetist’s preference. Overall, general anaesthetics play a crucial role in modern medicine by allowing for safe and painless surgical procedures.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disorder with autosomal dominant transmission that is the most common form of inherited cardiomyopathy. It has a prevalence of about 100 per 100,000 and can present with symptoms similar to aortic stenosis, but with a jerky pulse. Sudden death can be the first symptom, especially during or after physical activity. Risk factors for sudden death in HCM include a history of previous cardiac arrest or sustained ventricular tachycardia, recurrent syncope, adverse genotype and/or family history, exercise-induced hypotension, multiple episodes of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia on ambulatory ECG, and a marked increase in the thickness of the left ventricular wall. Dilated cardiomyopathy is the most common form of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, but given the patient’s family history, jerky pulse, and collapse on exercise, it is not the most likely cause. Mitral valve prolapse tends to present with palpitations, dyspnoea, low BMI, chest pain, and syncope, with a mid-systolic click followed by a late systolic murmur. Aortic stenosis can cause dizziness, syncope, and angina, but the family history makes HCM more likely than AS. Pericarditis tends to cause central chest pain that is relieved by leaning forward and worsened by coughing or straining.

For a patient with poorly controlled moderate hypertension who is already taking an ACE inhibitor, calcium channel blocker, and thiazide diuretic, the recommended next step would be to add spironolactone if their potassium level is less than 4.5mmol/L. Atenolol may be considered as a fourth-line agent if the potassium level is over 4.5mmol/L, but spironolactone is preferred according to NICE guidelines. Hydralazine should not be used outside of specialist care, and indapamide is not the best option as the patient is already taking a thiazide diuretic. Prazosin is an alternative to spironolactone, but spironolactone is preferred given the lower potassium level.

NICE Guidelines for Managing Hypertension

Hypertension, or high blood pressure, is a common condition that can lead to serious health problems if left untreated. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has published updated guidelines for the management of hypertension in 2019. Some of the key changes include lowering the threshold for treating stage 1 hypertension in patients under 80 years old, allowing the use of angiotensin receptor blockers instead of ACE inhibitors, and recommending the use of a calcium channel blocker or thiazide-like diuretic in addition to an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker.

The guidelines also provide a flow chart for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. Lifestyle advice, such as reducing salt intake, caffeine intake, and alcohol consumption, as well as exercising more and losing weight, should not be forgotten and is frequently tested in exams. Treatment options depend on the patient’s age, ethnicity, and other factors, and may involve a combination of drugs.

NICE recommends treating stage 1 hypertension in patients under 80 years old if they have target organ damage, established cardiovascular disease, renal disease, diabetes, or a 10-year cardiovascular risk equivalent to 10% or greater. For patients with stage 2 hypertension, drug treatment should be offered regardless of age. The guidelines also provide step-by-step treatment options, including adding a third or fourth drug if necessary.

New drugs, such as direct renin inhibitors like Aliskiren, may have a role in patients who are intolerant of more established antihypertensive drugs. However, trials have only investigated the fall in blood pressure and no mortality data is available yet. Patients who fail to respond to step 4 measures should be referred to a specialist. The guidelines also provide blood pressure targets for different age groups.

Treatment Options for Atrial Fibrillation: Warfarin, DOACs, Aspirin, Digoxin, Furosemide, and Lidocaine

Patients with atrial fibrillation and a CHA2DS2-VASC score of 4 require anticoagulation to reduce the risk of a CVA. The two main options are warfarin and DOACs, but the choice depends on other co-morbidities and patient preference. Before starting warfarin, patients should be referred to the Anticoagulation Clinic and screened for contraindications.

Aspirin has no benefit in atrial fibrillation, and digoxin should only be used for short-term rate control due to evidence of increased mortality with long-term use. Furosemide can help with symptoms and edema in heart failure but does not improve mortality. Lidocaine is only appropriate for ventricular arrhythmias in unstable patients and requires specialist support.

In summary, the treatment options for atrial fibrillation vary depending on the patient’s individual circumstances and should be carefully considered by healthcare professionals.

Understanding ECG Findings in Acute Pericarditis

Acute pericarditis is a condition that commonly presents with central pleuritic chest pain, relieved on leaning forward. One of the main ECG findings in acute pericarditis is widespread concave ST-segment elevations with PR-segment depression, which is 85% specific for the condition. Absent P waves are not typically caused by acute pericarditis, and ST-segment elevation in the anterior leads is more suggestive of anterior myocardial infarction. U waves are not characteristic ECG findings in acute pericarditis and are associated with other conditions. Other clinical features of acute pericarditis are largely dependent on the underlying cause. It is important to understand these ECG findings to aid in the diagnosis and management of acute pericarditis.

Mechanical valves are typically preferred for younger patients as they have a longer lifespan compared to other types of prosthetic heart valves.

Prosthetic Heart Valves: Options for Replacement

Prosthetic heart valves are commonly used to replace damaged aortic and mitral valves. There are two main options for replacement: biological (bioprosthetic) or mechanical. Biological valves are usually sourced from bovine or porcine origins and are commonly used in older patients. However, they have a major disadvantage of structural deterioration and calcification over time. On the other hand, mechanical valves have a low failure rate but require long-term anticoagulation due to the increased risk of thrombosis. Warfarin is still the preferred anticoagulant for patients with mechanical heart valves, and the target INR varies depending on the valve type. Aspirin is only given in addition if there is an additional indication, such as ischaemic heart disease. Following the 2008 NICE guidelines, antibiotics are no longer recommended for common procedures such as dental work for prophylaxis of endocarditis.

Patients with HOCM should avoid ACE-inhibitors.

The correct answer is Ramipril. In patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, ACE inhibitors are not recommended. This is because ACE inhibitors can decrease afterload, which may exacerbate the LVOT gradient. The patient in this case has echocardiographic evidence of HOCM, including asymmetric hypertrophy, systolic anterior motion of the anterior mitral valve leaflet, and mitral regurgitation.

However, amiodarone, atenolol, disopyramide, and verapamil are all viable treatment options for HOCM.

Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) is a genetic disorder that affects muscle tissue and is inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. It is estimated to have a prevalence of 1 in 500. The condition is caused by defects in the genes that encode contractile proteins.

The management of HOCM involves several approaches. Amiodarone is a medication that can be used to treat the condition. Beta-blockers or verapamil may also be prescribed to alleviate symptoms. In some cases, a cardioverter defibrillator or dual chamber pacemaker may be necessary. It is important to note that certain drugs, such as nitrates, ACE-inhibitors, and inotropes, should be avoided in patients with HOCM. Additionally, endocarditis prophylaxis may be recommended, although the 2008 NICE guidelines should be consulted for specific recommendations.

The initial management for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction involves prescribing an ACE inhibitor (or ARB, as in this patient’s case) and a beta-blocker. However, since the patient’s symptoms are not under control despite taking these medications, it is recommended to add spironolactone (a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist) to their treatment plan.

Bendroflumethiazide is not a suitable long-term management option for heart failure, as thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics are not recommended.
Diltiazem, a calcium channel blocker, is contraindicated for chronic heart failure.
Dobutamine, an inotrope, may be used in acute decompensated heart failure but is not appropriate for stable management of chronic heart failure.
Ramipril is not a suitable option for this patient as they are already taking candesartan, another angiotensin II receptor blocker.

Drug Management for Chronic Heart Failure: NICE Guidelines

Chronic heart failure is a serious condition that requires proper management to improve patient outcomes. In 2018, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) updated their guidelines on drug management for chronic heart failure. The guidelines recommend first-line therapy with both an ACE-inhibitor and a beta-blocker, with clinical judgement used to determine which one to start first. Second-line therapy involves the use of aldosterone antagonists, which should be monitored for hyperkalaemia. SGLT-2 inhibitors are also increasingly being used to manage heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. Third-line therapy should be initiated by a specialist and may include ivabradine, sacubitril-valsartan, hydralazine in combination with nitrate, digoxin, or cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Other treatments such as annual influenza and one-off pneumococcal vaccines are also recommended.

Overall, the NICE guidelines provide a comprehensive approach to drug management for chronic heart failure. It is important to note that loop diuretics have not been shown to reduce mortality in the long-term, and that ACE-inhibitors and beta-blockers have no effect on mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Healthcare professionals should carefully consider the patient’s individual needs and circumstances when determining the appropriate drug therapy for chronic heart failure.

Infective endocarditis is a serious infection of the heart lining and valves. The 2008 guidelines from NICE have changed the list of procedures for which antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended. According to NICE, dental procedures, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and respiratory tract procedures do not require prophylaxis. However, if a person at risk of infective endocarditis is receiving antimicrobial therapy because they are undergoing a gastrointestinal or genitourinary procedure at a site where there is a suspected infection, they should be given an antibiotic that covers organisms that cause infective endocarditis. It is important to note that these recommendations differ from the American Heart Association/European Society of Cardiology guidelines, which still advocate antibiotic prophylaxis for high-risk patients undergoing dental procedures.

The guidelines suggest that any episodes of infection in people at risk of infective endocarditis should be investigated and treated promptly to reduce the risk of endocarditis developing. It is crucial to follow these guidelines to prevent the development of infective endocarditis, which can lead to severe complications and even death. It is also important to note that these guidelines may change over time as new research and evidence become available. Therefore, healthcare professionals should stay up-to-date with the latest recommendations to provide the best possible care for their patients.

Medication Options for Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients

After a myocardial infarction (MI), it is important for patients to receive appropriate medication to prevent further cardiovascular events. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend the use of aspirin, ticagrelor, bisoprolol, ramipril, and a statin for dual antiplatelet therapy, β-blocker, ACE inhibitor, and cholesterol-lowering medication. The β-blocker and ACE inhibitor should be increased to the maximum tolerated dose.

While isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN) is a useful anti-anginal medication, it is not indicated for post-MI patients. Instead, aspirin, bisoprolol, ramipril, losartan, and a statin may be prescribed. However, the use of an ACE inhibitor alongside an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) is not recommended due to their similar mechanism of action. Nitrates, such as ISMN, are also used as anti-anginals, but ACE inhibitors are preferred over ARBs.

For patients on aspirin, bisoprolol, ramipril, and a statin, a second antiplatelet medication, such as clopidogrel, may be added for the first 12 months following an MI, unless there is a contraindication such as concomitant use of warfarin. It is important for healthcare providers to carefully consider the appropriate medication regimen for each post-MI patient to optimize their cardiovascular health.

Medications for Heart Failure Management

Heart failure is a serious condition that requires proper management to improve outcomes. Two drugs that have been shown to reduce mortality in heart failure are angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and beta blockers. Aspirin, on the other hand, is used to reduce the risk of mortality and further cardiovascular events following myocardial infarction and stroke, but it has no role in heart failure alone.

Digoxin can be used for short-term rate control for atrial fibrillation, but long-term use should be approached with caution as it may lead to increased mortality. Furosemide is useful in managing symptoms and edema in heart failure, but it has not been shown to have a mortality benefit.

Lidocaine and other antiarrhythmic agents are only useful when there is arrhythmia associated with heart failure and should only be used with specialist support for ventricular arrhythmias in an unstable patient. Standard drugs such as digitalis and diuretics have not been shown to improve survival rates.

Studies have shown that reducing left ventricular afterload prolongs survival rates in congestive heart failure. Vasodilators such as ACE inhibitors are effective in inhibiting the formation of angiotensin II, affecting coronary artery tone and arterial wall hyperplasia. There is also evidence for the use of beta blockers in heart failure management.

In conclusion, proper medication management is crucial in improving outcomes for patients with heart failure. ACE inhibitors, beta blockers, and vasodilators have been shown to reduce mortality rates, while other drugs such as aspirin, digoxin, and furosemide have specific roles in managing symptoms and associated conditions.

Effects of Different Anti-Arrhythmic Drugs on QT Interval

The QT interval is an important measure of cardiac repolarization, and abnormalities in this interval can lead to life-threatening arrhythmias. Different anti-arrhythmic drugs have varying effects on the QT interval.

Cardiac glycosides such as digoxin and ouabain can shorten the QT interval, even at therapeutic doses. This is due to their ability to shorten the atrial and ventricular refractory periods.

Class Ia drugs like disopyramide, class Ic drugs like flecainide, and class III drugs like amiodarone and sotalol all prolong the QT interval. Disopyramide can result in a long PR interval, while flecainide can cause a broad QRS or prolonged QT interval. Amiodarone is a class III drug that prolongs the QT interval, and sotalol causes dose-related prolongation of the QT interval.

β-blockers like atenolol have a neutral effect on the QT interval in patients with a normal QT interval. However, they can act to stabilise the QT interval in patients with long QT syndrome.

In summary, different anti-arrhythmic drugs have varying effects on the QT interval, and it is important to monitor this interval when prescribing these medications.

Heart failure patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than or equal to 40% and symptoms no more severe than class III according to the New York Heart Association functional classification may benefit from digoxin in terms of reducing hospitalization. However, it does not have an impact on mortality. While increasing the dosage of furosemide may provide relief from fluid overload symptoms, it does not affect mortality.

Non-Drug Management for Chronic Heart Failure

Chronic heart failure is a condition that requires long-term management to improve symptoms and reduce hospitalization. While medication is often the first line of treatment, non-drug management options are also available. Two such options are cardiac resynchronization therapy and exercise training.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy involves biventricular pacing for patients with heart failure and wide QRS. This therapy has been shown to improve symptoms and reduce hospitalization in patients with NYHA class III heart failure. By synchronizing the heart’s contractions, this therapy can improve the heart’s pumping ability and reduce symptoms such as shortness of breath and fatigue.

Exercise training is another non-drug management option for chronic heart failure. While it may not reduce hospitalization or mortality rates, it has been shown to improve symptoms. Exercise can help improve the heart’s ability to pump blood and increase overall fitness levels. This can lead to a reduction in symptoms such as fatigue and shortness of breath, allowing patients to engage in daily activities with greater ease.

Overall, non-drug management options such as cardiac resynchronization therapy and exercise training can be effective in managing chronic heart failure. These options can improve symptoms and quality of life for patients, reducing the need for hospitalization and improving overall health outcomes.

During advanced ALS, the recommended dose of adrenaline to administer is 1mg. If the patient is identified in the hospital, they should receive a minimum shock of 150 joules (unless the defibrillator model specifies otherwise). Compressions at a rate of 30:2 should be resumed for 2 minutes, followed by reassessment of the rhythm. If VF or pVT persists, a second shock should be given. Repeat the previous steps until the third shock, at which point 1mg IV of adrenaline and 300 mg IV of amiodarone should be administered while continuing CPR. Afterward, 1mg of adrenaline should be given after every other shock. Consider administering a second dose of amiodarone after a total of 5 defibrillation attempts if it is available. If amiodarone is not available, lidocaine can be used.

The 2015 Resus Council guidelines for adult advanced life support outline the steps to be taken when dealing with patients with shockable and non-shockable rhythms. For both types of patients, chest compressions are a crucial part of the process, with a ratio of 30 compressions to 2 ventilations. Defibrillation is recommended for shockable rhythms, with a single shock for VF/pulseless VT followed by 2 minutes of CPR. Adrenaline and amiodarone are the drugs of choice for non-shockable rhythms, with adrenaline given as soon as possible and amiodarone administered after 3 shocks for VF/pulseless VT. Thrombolytic drugs should be considered if a pulmonary embolus is suspected. Atropine is no longer recommended for routine use in asystole or PEA. Oxygen should be titrated to achieve saturations of 94-98% following successful resuscitation. The Hs and Ts should be considered as potential reversible causes of cardiac arrest.