The preferred initial diagnostic test for individuals with stable chest pain suspected to be caused by coronary artery disease is a CT coronary angiogram with contrast enhancement.

Assessment of Patients with Suspected Cardiac Chest Pain

When it comes to assessing patients with suspected cardiac chest pain, NICE has updated its guidelines in 2016. For patients presenting with acute chest pain, immediate management of suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is crucial. This includes administering glyceryl trinitrate and aspirin 300 mg, but not other antiplatelet agents like Clopidogrel outside of the hospital. Oxygen therapy should not be routinely given, but only if sats are less than 94%. Referral depends on the timing of chest pain and ECG results. For patients presenting with stable chest pain, NICE defines anginal pain as constricting discomfort in the front of the chest, neck, shoulders, jaw, or arms, precipitated by physical exertion, and relieved by rest or GTN in about 5 minutes. Non-invasive functional imaging is recommended for patients in whom stable angina cannot be excluded by clinical assessment alone. Examples of non-invasive functional imaging include myocardial perfusion scintigraphy with single photon emission computed tomography (MPS with SPECT), stress echocardiography, first-pass contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion, or MR imaging for stress-induced wall motion abnormalities.

In summary, assessing patients with suspected cardiac chest pain requires immediate management for acute chest pain and referral based on timing and ECG results. For stable chest pain, NICE defines anginal pain and recommends non-invasive functional imaging for patients in whom stable angina cannot be excluded by clinical assessment alone.

NICE recommends using the CHA2DS2-VASc score to determine the need for anticoagulation in patients with any history of AF. The ORBIT scoring system should be used to assess bleeding risk, but anticoagulation should not be withheld solely on the grounds of age or risk of falls. DOACs are now recommended as the first-line anticoagulant for patients with AF, with warfarin used second-line if a DOAC is contraindicated or not tolerated. Aspirin is not recommended for reducing stroke risk in patients with AF.

For the treatment of hypertension in diabetic patients, the first-line medication should be ACE inhibitors such as ramipril. However, this may not be suitable for individuals of Afro-Caribbean descent or women who may become pregnant. In case of a cough developing with ACE inhibitors, an angiotensin-II receptor antagonist like losartan should be prescribed. If the patient is not diabetic, calcium channel blockers like amlodipine or diuretics such as indapamide would be the preferred initial treatment. Beta blockers like propranolol are not typically the first choice for hypertension treatment, but may be considered for young patients who cannot tolerate ACE inhibitors or women attempting to conceive.

NICE released updated guidelines in 2019 for the management of hypertension, building on previous guidelines from 2011. These guidelines aimed to classify hypertension into stages and recommend the use of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) to accurately diagnose hypertension. This is important because some patients experience white coat hypertension, where their blood pressure rises in a clinical setting, leading to potential overdiagnosis of hypertension. ABPM and HBPM allow for a more accurate assessment of a patient’s overall blood pressure and can prevent overdiagnosis.

NICE recommends measuring blood pressure in both arms when considering a diagnosis of hypertension and repeating measurements if there is a difference of more than 20 mmHg between arms. If the blood pressure is >= 140/90 mmHg, NICE suggests offering ABPM or HBPM to confirm the diagnosis. If the blood pressure is >= 180/120 mmHg, referral for specialist assessment is recommended if there are signs of retinal haemorrhage or papilloedema or life-threatening symptoms. If target organ damage is identified, antihypertensive drug treatment may be started immediately.

ABPM involves taking at least 2 measurements per hour during the person’s usual waking hours and using the average value of at least 14 measurements. If ABPM is not tolerated, HBPM should be offered. HBPM involves taking two consecutive measurements at least 1 minute apart, twice daily for at least 4 days, and using the average value of all remaining measurements.

Interpreting the results of ABPM/HBPM is important for determining treatment. If the average blood pressure is >= 135/85 mmHg (stage 1 hypertension), treatment may be considered for patients under 80 years of age with target organ damage, established cardiovascular disease, renal disease, diabetes, or a 10-year cardiovascular risk equivalent to 10% or greater. In 2019, NICE also recommended considering antihypertensive drug treatment for adults under 60 with stage 1 hypertension and an estimated 10-year risk below 10%. If the average blood pressure is >= 150/95 mmHg (stage 2 hypertension), drug treatment should be offered regardless of age.

The left main coronary artery is not the cause of heart block. It usually results in anterior myocardial infarction.

Understanding Heart Blocks and their Features

Heart blocks are a type of cardiac conduction disorder that can lead to a range of symptoms and complications. There are three types of heart blocks, each with distinct features and characteristics. First-degree heart block is characterized by a prolonged PR interval, while second-degree heart block can be further divided into two subtypes: Mobitz I and Mobitz II. Mobitz I is characterized by a progressive prolongation of the PR interval until a dropped beat occurs, while Mobitz II is characterized by a constant PR interval but often not followed by a QRS complex.

The most severe form of heart block is third-degree or complete heart block, which is characterized by a complete dissociation between the P waves and QRS complexes. This can lead to a range of symptoms, including syncope, heart failure, regular bradycardia, and wide pulse pressure. Other features of complete heart block include cannon waves in the neck and variable intensity of S1.

To confirm posterior infarction, a posterior ECG should be recorded when ST elevation and Q waves are present in posterior leads (V7-9). In this case, the patient presented with symptoms suggestive of myocardial infarction and the ECG showed changes that indicated the need for a posterior ECG. This involves placing leads V4-V6 on the patient’s back to make leads V7-V9. ST-elevation and Q waves in these leads confirm posterior infarction, and the patient should be transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention as soon as possible. It is important to have a high index of suspicion for posterior MIs and a low threshold for getting a posterior ECG.

Giving IV potassium replacement or calcium gluconate IV would be incorrect in this case. These treatments are used for hypokalaemia and severe hyperkalaemia, respectively, and are not the most likely diagnoses. Ibuprofen and colchicine would be appropriate for pericarditis, which presents with chest pain that is worse on lying flat and has characteristic ECG changes. However, the clinical picture and ECG changes in this case are more consistent with ACS.

A CT aortogram is used to investigate for aortic dissection, which can present with severe chest pain, breathlessness, and sweating. However, it would be best to record a posterior ECG to investigate for posterior MI prior to investigating for an aortic dissection due to the classic features of ACS in the history.

Anteroseptal changes in V1-V4 indicate involvement of the left anterior descending artery. Inferior changes in II, III, and aVF suggest the right coronary artery is affected. Anterolateral changes in V1-6, I, and aVL indicate the proximal left anterior descending artery is involved. Lateral changes in I, aVL, and possibly V5-6 suggest the left circumflex artery is affected. Posterior changes in V1-3 may indicate a posterior infarction, which is confirmed by ST elevation and Q waves in posterior leads (V7-9). This type of infarction is usually caused by the left circumflex artery, but can also be caused by the right coronary artery. Reciprocal changes of STEMI are typically seen as horizontal ST depression, tall and broad R waves, upright T waves, and a dominant R wave in V2. It is important to note that a new left bundle branch block (LBBB) may indicate acute coronary syndrome.

Overall, understanding the correlation between ECG changes and coronary artery territories is crucial in diagnosing acute coronary syndrome. By identifying the specific changes in the ECG, medical professionals can determine which artery is affected and provide appropriate treatment. Additionally, recognizing the reciprocal changes of STEMI and the significance of a new LBBB can aid in making an accurate diagnosis.

An ST-elevated myocardial infarction affecting the inferior leads (II, III, aVF) can cause arrhythmias due to the involvement of the right coronary artery, which supplies blood to the AV node. This is evidenced by the patient’s presentation with 1st-degree heart block following the MI.

Anteroseptal changes in V1-V4 indicate involvement of the left anterior descending artery. Inferior changes in II, III, and aVF suggest the right coronary artery is affected. Anterolateral changes in V1-6, I, and aVL indicate the proximal left anterior descending artery is involved. Lateral changes in I, aVL, and possibly V5-6 suggest the left circumflex artery is affected. Posterior changes in V1-3 may indicate a posterior infarction, which is confirmed by ST elevation and Q waves in posterior leads (V7-9). This type of infarction is usually caused by the left circumflex artery, but can also be caused by the right coronary artery. Reciprocal changes of STEMI are typically seen as horizontal ST depression, tall and broad R waves, upright T waves, and a dominant R wave in V2. It is important to note that a new left bundle branch block (LBBB) may indicate acute coronary syndrome.

Overall, understanding the correlation between ECG changes and coronary artery territories is crucial in diagnosing acute coronary syndrome. By identifying the specific changes in the ECG, medical professionals can determine which artery is affected and provide appropriate treatment. Additionally, recognizing the reciprocal changes of STEMI and the significance of a new LBBB can aid in making an accurate diagnosis.

Treatment Options for Pre-eclampsia in Pregnancy

Pre-eclampsia is a serious condition that can occur during pregnancy, characterized by high blood pressure, headaches, flashing lights, and vomiting. The following are treatment options for pre-eclampsia:

Labetalol: This beta-blocker is the first-line treatment for pre-eclampsia. According to NICE guidelines, patients should be admitted for monitoring if their blood pressure is above 140/90 mmHg. Labetalol should be used if their systolic blood pressure goes above 150 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure above 100 mmHg. Nifedipine can be used as an alternative if labetalol is contraindicated or not tolerated.

Ramipril: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are not recommended during pregnancy due to potential harm to the fetus.

Hydralazine: This vasodilator is reserved for severe pre-eclampsia and requires specialist support.

Methyldopa: This medication is the third-line option if labetalol is ineffective and nifedipine is not tolerated or ineffective.

Nifedipine: This calcium channel blocker is the second-line treatment if labetalol is ineffective or not tolerated.

In conclusion, pre-eclampsia requires prompt treatment to prevent serious complications. Labetalol is the first-line treatment, and other medications can be used if necessary. It is important to consult with a healthcare provider to determine the best course of action for each individual case.

For reducing the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the first-line anticoagulation should be a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) such as rivaroxaban. This recommendation is based on a scenario where a patient is found to have AF during a wellbeing check and requires anticoagulation due to the increased risk of thrombosis. Aspirin is not the correct choice as it is an antiplatelet and not an anticoagulant. While dalteparin and enoxaparin are low molecular weight heparins that are often used for VTE prophylaxis, DOACs are preferred first-line for stroke risk reduction in AF. Patients often prefer DOACs as they are available in tablet form.

NICE recommends using the CHA2DS2-VASc score to determine the need for anticoagulation in patients with any history of AF. The ORBIT scoring system should be used to assess bleeding risk, but anticoagulation should not be withheld solely on the grounds of age or risk of falls. DOACs are now recommended as the first-line anticoagulant for patients with AF, with warfarin used second-line if a DOAC is contraindicated or not tolerated. Aspirin is not recommended for reducing stroke risk in patients with AF.

Myocardial infarction (MI) is a serious condition that requires proper management to prevent further complications. In 2013, NICE released guidelines on the secondary prevention of MI. One of the key recommendations is the use of four drugs: dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus a second antiplatelet agent), ACE inhibitor, beta-blocker, and statin. Patients are also advised to adopt a Mediterranean-style diet and engage in regular exercise. Sexual activity may resume four weeks after an uncomplicated MI, and PDE5 inhibitors may be used six months after the event.

Most patients with acute coronary syndrome are now given dual antiplatelet therapy, with ticagrelor and prasugrel being the preferred options. The treatment period for these drugs is 12 months, after which they should be stopped. However, this period may be adjusted for patients at high risk of bleeding or further ischaemic events. Additionally, patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction should be treated with an aldosterone antagonist within 3-14 days of the MI, preferably after ACE inhibitor therapy.

Overall, the NICE guidelines provide a comprehensive approach to the secondary prevention of MI. By following these recommendations, patients can reduce their risk of further complications and improve their overall health outcomes.

Management of Bradycardia in Peri-Arrest Rhythms

The 2015 Resuscitation Council (UK) guidelines highlight the importance of identifying adverse signs and potential risk of asystole in the management of bradycardia in peri-arrest rhythms. Adverse signs indicating haemodynamic compromise include shock, syncope, myocardial ischaemia, and heart failure. Atropine (500 mcg IV) is the first line treatment in this situation. If there is an unsatisfactory response, interventions such as atropine (up to a maximum of 3mg), transcutaneous pacing, and isoprenaline/adrenaline infusion titrated to response may be used. Specialist help should be sought for consideration of transvenous pacing if there is no response to the above measures.

Furthermore, the presence of risk factors for asystole such as complete heart block with broad complex QRS, recent asystole, Mobitz type II AV block, and ventricular pause > 3 seconds should be considered. Even if there is a satisfactory response to atropine, specialist help is indicated to consider the need for transvenous pacing. Effective management of bradycardia in peri-arrest rhythms is crucial in preventing further deterioration and improving patient outcomes.