Suicide in Prison: High Rates and Risk Factors

Suicide rates among prisoners are significantly higher than in the general population, with an average rate of 133 per 100,000 population per year in England and Wales in 1999-2000. Remand prisoners had an even higher rate of 339 per 100,000 population per year. Early suicides were more common in drug-dependent prisoners, with 59% occurring within 7 days of reception into prison.

The most common method of suicide was hanging of self-strangulation, with bedclothes being the most common ligature used. Window bars, beds, and cell fittings such as lights, pipes, cupboards, sinks, toilets, of doors were the main ligature points. 72% of prisoners had at least one known psychiatric diagnosis, with drug dependence being the most common primary diagnosis at 27%. Schizophrenia was diagnosed in 6% of prisoners, and affective disorder in 18%.

Risk factors for suicide in prisoners include being in a single cell, being male, having a psychiatric illness, having a history of substance misuse, having a history of previous self-harm of attempted suicide, recent suicidal ideation, and being on remand. Surprisingly, being married was found to be a risk factor for suicide in prisoners, in contrast to the general population where it is a protective factor.

Overall, these findings highlight the urgent need for effective suicide prevention strategies in prisons, particularly for those at higher risk. This may include improved mental health services, better screening and assessment of risk factors, and measures to reduce access to means of suicide such as ligature points.

It is likely that the patient’s ongoing psychiatric symptoms will make it difficult for him to follow court proceedings, such as witness statements and cross-examination. The legal test for determining fitness to plead remains the case of R vs. Pritchard from 1836, which includes criteria such as the ability to enter a plea, understand the evidence against them, instruct their solicitor, follow court proceedings, and challenge a juror. While it may be possible to argue that the patient cannot give legal instruction, the question asks for the most likely criteria he would fail, and given his good relationship with his legal team and understanding of relevant issues, this may not be the case. It is important to note that believing actions are morally justified is not part of fitness to plead, but may be relevant to a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity. The patient acknowledges his actions and understands the difference between guilty and not guilty. While challenging a juror is an outdated aspect of the fitness to plead test, the patient appears to understand the roles of everyone present in court and would be able to request the removal of a juror with whom he had a prior acquaintance. There have been calls from psychiatrists to update the criteria for fitness to plead due to inconsistencies in their application, but this has not yet occurred.

It should be noted that the ICD-11 has reclassified gender incongruence from the ‘Mental and behavioural disorders’ chapter to the new ‘Conditions related to sexual health’ chapter, indicating that it is not considered a mental disorder. However, the DSM-5 still lists gender dysphoria as a mental disorder. Additionally, the DSM-5 specifies that transvestic disorder only applies when cross-dressing is accompanied by sexual excitement and emotional distress. This may involve wearing one of two articles of clothing of dressing completely in the clothing and accessories of the opposite sex, including wigs and makeup for men.

Paraphilias are intense and persistent sexual interests other than sexual interest in genital stimulation of preparatory fondling with phenotypically normal, physically mature, consenting human partners. They are divided into those relating to erotic activity and those relating to erotic target. In order to become a disorder, paraphilias must be associated with distress of impairment to the individual of with harm to others. The DSM-5 lists 8 recognised paraphilic disorder but acknowledges that there are many more. Treatment modalities for the paraphilias have limited scientific evidence to support their use. Psychological therapy (especially CBT) is often used (with extremely variable results). Pharmacological options include SSRI, Naltrexone, Antipsychotics, GnRH agonists, and Anti-androgens and progestational drugs (e.g. cyproterone acetate).

Recidivism Rates of Restricted Patients vs. UK Prison Population

Restricted patients are individuals who are under the risk management of the Secretary of State for Justice and receive care in secure hospitals. From 1998 to 2006, less than 500 restricted cases per year were reintegrated into the community, and their two-year re-conviction rates were 7% for all offenses and 1% for serious offenses. In contrast, the UK prison population had a much higher recidivism rate. In the first quarter of 2004, out of 20,000 individuals released from prison, 65% were convicted again for any offense. These findings suggest that the risk management strategies for restricted patients may be more effective in reducing recidivism rates compared to the general prison population.

Deceitfulness is the core diagnostic criterion, while the other options are considered associated features that may be present but are not essential for diagnosis.

Personality Disorder (Antisocial / Dissocial)

Antisocial personality disorder is characterized by impulsive, irresponsible, and often criminal behavior. The criteria for this disorder differ somewhat between the ICD-11 and DSM-5. The ICD-11 abolished all categories of personality disorder except for a general description of personality disorder. This diagnosis can be further specified as “mild,” “moderate,” of “severe.” Patient behavior can be described using one of more of five personality trait domains; negative affectivity, dissociality, anankastic, detachment, and disinhibition. Clinicians may also specify a borderline pattern qualifier.

The core feature of dissociality is a disregard for the rights and feelings of others, encompassing both self-centeredness and lack of empathy. Common manifestations of Dissociality include self-centeredness and lack of empathy. The DSM-5 defines antisocial personality disorder as a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others, occurring since age 15, as indicated by three (of more) of the following: failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors, deceitfulness, impulsivity of failure to plan ahead, irritability and aggressiveness, reckless disregard for safety of self of others, consistent irresponsibility, and lack of remorse.

Prevalence estimates are between 1%-6% in men and between 0.2-0.8% in women. Antisocial behaviors typically have their onset before age 8 years. Nearly 80% of people with ASPD developed their first symptom by age 11 years. Boys develop symptoms earlier than girls, who may not develop symptoms until puberty. An estimated 25% of girls and 40% of boys with Conduct Disorder will later meet criteria for ASPD.

The 2009 NICE Guidelines essentially make two recommendations on treatment: consider offering group-based cognitive and behavioral interventions and pharmacological interventions should not be routinely used for the treatment of antisocial personality disorder of associated behaviors of aggression, anger, and impulsivity. A Cochrane review found that there is not enough good quality evidence to recommend of reject any psychological treatment for people with a diagnosis of AsPD.

The term psychopathy has varied meanings. Some use the term synonymously with APD and consider it to represent the severe end of the spectrum of APD. Others maintain a clear distinction between psychopathy and APD. Psychopathy has been said to be a richer (broader) concept than APD. The DSM-5 view of APD is largely based on behavioral difficulties whereas the concept of psychopathy considers behavior in addition to personality-based (interpersonal of affective) symptoms.

DUNDRUM-4 Recovery Items

The DUNDRUM-4 Recovery Items is a structured professional judgement instrument that assesses a patient’s progress towards recovery and their readiness for discharge from a secure mental health facility. It consists of 17 items that cover various aspects of recovery, such as symptom management, social functioning, and engagement in therapeutic activities.

The instrument is designed to be used by mental health professionals to monitor a patient’s progress over time and to identify areas where additional support of interventions may be needed. It can also be used to inform discharge planning and to ensure that patients are discharged safely and with appropriate follow-up care.

Overall, the DUNDRUM toolkit provides a comprehensive approach to assessing and managing patients in secure mental health facilities, with a focus on promoting recovery and ensuring that patients receive the appropriate level of care and support.

Out of the 131 accounts of filicide reviewed by Phillip Resnick between 1751 and 1967, the motive of altruism was the most frequently observed, making up 49% of cases. On the other hand, spousal revenge was only found to account for 2% of cases.

According to BAP, IV olanzapine is one of the options for rapid tranquilization.

Violence and aggression can be managed through rapid tranquillisation, although the evidence base for this approach is not strong. Different guidelines provide varying recommendations for rapid tranquillisation, including NICE, Maudsley Guidelines, and the British Association for Psychopharmacology (BAP). NICE recommends using IM lorazepam of IM haloperidol + IM promethazine for rapid tranquillisation in adults, taking into account factors such as previous response and patient preference. BAP provides a range of options for oral, inhaled, IM, and IV medications, including inhaled loxapine, buccal midazolam, and oral antipsychotics. Maudsley Guidelines suggest using oral lorazepam, oral promethazine, of buccal midazolam if prescribed a regular antipsychotic, of oral olanzapine, oral risperidone, of oral haloperidol if not already taking an antipsychotic. IM options include lorazepam, promethazine, olanzapine, aripiprazole, and haloperidol, although drugs should not be mixed in the same syringe. Haloperidol should ideally be used with promethazine to reduce the risk of dystonia.

– Diminished responsibility can only be applied in murder cases in English law
– It diminishes the defendant’s liability for their actions
– Criteria for diminished responsibility include:
– Abnormality of mental functioning caused by a recognised medical condition
– Impairment of mental ability to understand the nature of their conduct, form a rational judgement, of exercise self-control
– Advising that the defendant did not know the nature of their act refers to Not Guilty By Reason of Insanity
– Advising that the defendant cannot follow proceedings in court refers to Fitness to Plead
– Epilepsy has been used as a mental health defence in both Diminished Responsibility and Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity pleas in the past.

Pritchard, a person who was unable to hear of speak, was charged with engaging in sexual activity with an animal.

Fitness to Plead: Criteria and Process

Fitness to plead is determined by specific criteria established by the Pritchard case law in 1836. The criteria include the ability to instruct solicitor and counsel, understand the charges, decide whether to plead guilty of not, follow court proceedings, challenge a juror, and give evidence in one’s defense. Schizophrenia and other enduring mental illnesses are the most common conditions associated with unfitness to plead, particularly when positive psychotic symptomatology is present. Intellectual impairment is not a significant factor in most cases. If the issue is raised by the defense, it must be established on a balance of probability, while if raised by the prosecution of judge, it must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. Amnesia does not render someone unfit to plead. The decision on fitness to plead is made by a judge, not a jury. If someone is found unfit to plead, they are subject to the Criminal Procedures Act 1991, which involves a trial of facts, complete acquittal if the facts are not found, and flexible disposal by the judge if the facts are found, except for murder, which requires mandatory committal to hospital.

The HCR-20 is a comprehensive tool used to assess the risk of violence in adults. It takes into account various factors from the past, present, and future to provide a holistic view of the individual’s risk. The tool consists of 20 items, which are divided into three domains: historical, clinical, and risk management.

The historical domain includes factors such as previous violence, young age at first violent incident, relationship instability, employment problems, substance use problems, major mental illness, psychopathy, early maladjustment, personality disorder, and prior supervision failure. These factors are important to consider as they provide insight into the individual’s past behavior and potential risk for future violence.

The clinical domain includes factors such as lack of insight, negative attitudes, active symptoms of major mental illness, impulsivity, and unresponsiveness to treatment. These factors are important to consider as they provide insight into the individual’s current mental state and potential risk for future violence.

The risk management domain includes factors such as plans lack feasibility, exposure to destabilizers, lack of personal support, noncompliance with remediation attempts, and stress. These factors are important to consider as they provide insight into the individual’s ability to manage their risk and potential for future violence.

Overall, the HCR-20 is a valuable tool for assessing the risk of violence in adults. It provides a comprehensive view of the individual’s risk and can be used to inform treatment and risk management strategies.

Historical Development of Forensic Psychiatry

Forensic psychiatry in Great Britain had a slow start, with only a handful of forensic psychiatrists in 1975. However, the case of Graham Young, which resulted in the Butler Report of 1975, brought about significant changes in the field. This case led to the expansion of forensic mental health services, with the establishment of regional secure units (now called medium secure units) in most health regions in England and Wales. Prior to this, there were only three high secure hospitals, namely Broadmoor, Rampton, and Ashworth. The development of these secure units marked a turning point in the history of forensic psychiatry, as it allowed for the provision of specialized care for mentally disordered offenders in a less restrictive environment.

One of the primary criticisms of the HCR-20 is its failure to account for protective factors. While formal training is not required to use the tool, it is recommended. Additionally, the HCR-20 only assesses the risk of violence towards people and does not consider violence towards animals of property. The value of the HCR-20 lies in the process of completing it, rather than the final score, which is considered meaningless and cannot be used to determine dangerousness. The HCR-20 can be completed by an individual of a team.

The HCR-20 is a comprehensive tool used to assess the risk of violence in adults. It takes into account various factors from the past, present, and future to provide a holistic view of the individual’s risk. The tool consists of 20 items, which are divided into three domains: historical, clinical, and risk management.

The historical domain includes factors such as previous violence, young age at first violent incident, relationship instability, employment problems, substance use problems, major mental illness, psychopathy, early maladjustment, personality disorder, and prior supervision failure. These factors are important to consider as they provide insight into the individual’s past behavior and potential risk for future violence.

The clinical domain includes factors such as lack of insight, negative attitudes, active symptoms of major mental illness, impulsivity, and unresponsiveness to treatment. These factors are important to consider as they provide insight into the individual’s current mental state and potential risk for future violence.

The risk management domain includes factors such as plans lack feasibility, exposure to destabilizers, lack of personal support, noncompliance with remediation attempts, and stress. These factors are important to consider as they provide insight into the individual’s ability to manage their risk and potential for future violence.

Overall, the HCR-20 is a valuable tool for assessing the risk of violence in adults. It provides a comprehensive view of the individual’s risk and can be used to inform treatment and risk management strategies.

While the PCL-R can aid in evaluating the extent of the disorder, it should not be solely relied upon for diagnosis.

Personality Disorder (Antisocial / Dissocial)

Antisocial personality disorder is characterized by impulsive, irresponsible, and often criminal behavior. The criteria for this disorder differ somewhat between the ICD-11 and DSM-5. The ICD-11 abolished all categories of personality disorder except for a general description of personality disorder. This diagnosis can be further specified as “mild,” “moderate,” of “severe.” Patient behavior can be described using one of more of five personality trait domains; negative affectivity, dissociality, anankastic, detachment, and disinhibition. Clinicians may also specify a borderline pattern qualifier.

The core feature of dissociality is a disregard for the rights and feelings of others, encompassing both self-centeredness and lack of empathy. Common manifestations of Dissociality include self-centeredness and lack of empathy. The DSM-5 defines antisocial personality disorder as a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others, occurring since age 15, as indicated by three (of more) of the following: failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors, deceitfulness, impulsivity of failure to plan ahead, irritability and aggressiveness, reckless disregard for safety of self of others, consistent irresponsibility, and lack of remorse.

Prevalence estimates are between 1%-6% in men and between 0.2-0.8% in women. Antisocial behaviors typically have their onset before age 8 years. Nearly 80% of people with ASPD developed their first symptom by age 11 years. Boys develop symptoms earlier than girls, who may not develop symptoms until puberty. An estimated 25% of girls and 40% of boys with Conduct Disorder will later meet criteria for ASPD.

The 2009 NICE Guidelines essentially make two recommendations on treatment: consider offering group-based cognitive and behavioral interventions and pharmacological interventions should not be routinely used for the treatment of antisocial personality disorder of associated behaviors of aggression, anger, and impulsivity. A Cochrane review found that there is not enough good quality evidence to recommend of reject any psychological treatment for people with a diagnosis of AsPD.

The term psychopathy has varied meanings. Some use the term synonymously with APD and consider it to represent the severe end of the spectrum of APD. Others maintain a clear distinction between psychopathy and APD. Psychopathy has been said to be a richer (broader) concept than APD. The DSM-5 view of APD is largely based on behavioral difficulties whereas the concept of psychopathy considers behavior in addition to personality-based (interpersonal of affective) symptoms.

Stalking is a serious issue that can cause significant distress to victims. While most victims are not physically assaulted, the psychological and social damage can be severe. It is concerning that nearly half of stalkers re-offend, with personality disordered individuals and substance abusers being the most likely to do so. It is also alarming that professionals, such as psychiatrists, are at higher risk of being stalked by patients of their relatives. It is important for society to take stalking seriously and provide support and protection for victims.

There are several screening tools available for personality disorder, including SAPAS, FFMRF, IPDE, PDQ-R, IPDS, and IIP-PD. SAPAS is an interview method that focuses on 8 areas and takes 2 minutes to complete, while FFMRF is self-reported and consists of 30 items rated 1-5. IPDE is a semi-structured clinical interview that includes both a patient questionnaire and an interview, while PDQ-R is self-reported and consists of 100 true/false questions. IPDS is an interview method that consists of 11 criteria and takes less than 5 minutes, while IIP-PD is self-reported and contains 127 items rated 0-4. A score of 3 of more on SAPAS warrants further assessment.

The defendant can only plead Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI) if they have a defect of reason caused by a disease of the mind, which resulted in them not knowing the nature of their actions of not knowing that their actions were wrong. The causes of this defect of reason are broad, but acute intoxication is not included. However, if the defendant believed their actions were morally justified, this does not qualify as a defence of NGRI as the legal test only considers whether the defendant knew their actions were legally wrong. Despite feeling provoked and morally justified, the defendant still knew that stabbing someone was against the law. NGRI is a rare defence, used in less than 1% of cases, and is successful in only one in four of these cases.

Offending in the UK: Gender and Age Differences

The peak age for offending in the UK is different for girls and boys, with girls peaking at 14 years and boys at 17-18 years. Half of the more serious indictable crimes are committed by individuals under the age of 21. As individuals mature, crime rates generally decrease, except for a small peak in women aged 40-50 around menopause.

In the UK, males convicted of crimes outnumber females by a ratio of 5 to 1. Females are less frequently reported for crimes, especially by male police officers, yet they are up to three times more likely to be imprisoned for their first offense than males.

Female offenders tend to come from more damaged backgrounds and exhibit more psychological and behavioral disturbances than males who have committed the same offense. This is reflected in the fact that females in prison tend to be more behaviorally and psychiatrically disturbed than their male counterparts.

It’s important to note that fitness to plead pertains to an individual’s capacity to engage in a legal proceeding. Merely exhibiting symptoms of psychosis is insufficient; it’s necessary to demonstrate that they do not meet the criteria of the Pritchard test.

Fitness to Plead: Criteria and Process

Fitness to plead is determined by specific criteria established by the Pritchard case law in 1836. The criteria include the ability to instruct solicitor and counsel, understand the charges, decide whether to plead guilty of not, follow court proceedings, challenge a juror, and give evidence in one’s defense. Schizophrenia and other enduring mental illnesses are the most common conditions associated with unfitness to plead, particularly when positive psychotic symptomatology is present. Intellectual impairment is not a significant factor in most cases. If the issue is raised by the defense, it must be established on a balance of probability, while if raised by the prosecution of judge, it must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. Amnesia does not render someone unfit to plead. The decision on fitness to plead is made by a judge, not a jury. If someone is found unfit to plead, they are subject to the Criminal Procedures Act 1991, which involves a trial of facts, complete acquittal if the facts are not found, and flexible disposal by the judge if the facts are found, except for murder, which requires mandatory committal to hospital.

Exhibitionistic disorder can be diagnosed at any age, but it can be challenging to distinguish between exhibitionistic behaviors and normal sexual exploration in adolescents. While exhibitionistic tendencies typically develop during adolescence of early adulthood, there is limited information on whether these behaviors persist over time.

Paraphilias are intense and persistent sexual interests other than sexual interest in genital stimulation of preparatory fondling with phenotypically normal, physically mature, consenting human partners. They are divided into those relating to erotic activity and those relating to erotic target. In order to become a disorder, paraphilias must be associated with distress of impairment to the individual of with harm to others. The DSM-5 lists 8 recognised paraphilic disorder but acknowledges that there are many more. Treatment modalities for the paraphilias have limited scientific evidence to support their use. Psychological therapy (especially CBT) is often used (with extremely variable results). Pharmacological options include SSRI, Naltrexone, Antipsychotics, GnRH agonists, and Anti-androgens and progestational drugs (e.g. cyproterone acetate).

Paraphilias are intense and persistent sexual interests other than sexual interest in genital stimulation of preparatory fondling with phenotypically normal, physically mature, consenting human partners. They are divided into those relating to erotic activity and those relating to erotic target. In order to become a disorder, paraphilias must be associated with distress of impairment to the individual of with harm to others. The DSM-5 lists 8 recognised paraphilic disorder but acknowledges that there are many more. Treatment modalities for the paraphilias have limited scientific evidence to support their use. Psychological therapy (especially CBT) is often used (with extremely variable results). Pharmacological options include SSRI, Naltrexone, Antipsychotics, GnRH agonists, and Anti-androgens and progestational drugs (e.g. cyproterone acetate).

The HCR-20 is a comprehensive tool used to assess the risk of violence in adults. It takes into account various factors from the past, present, and future to provide a holistic view of the individual’s risk. The tool consists of 20 items, which are divided into three domains: historical, clinical, and risk management.

The historical domain includes factors such as previous violence, young age at first violent incident, relationship instability, employment problems, substance use problems, major mental illness, psychopathy, early maladjustment, personality disorder, and prior supervision failure. These factors are important to consider as they provide insight into the individual’s past behavior and potential risk for future violence.

The clinical domain includes factors such as lack of insight, negative attitudes, active symptoms of major mental illness, impulsivity, and unresponsiveness to treatment. These factors are important to consider as they provide insight into the individual’s current mental state and potential risk for future violence.

The risk management domain includes factors such as plans lack feasibility, exposure to destabilizers, lack of personal support, noncompliance with remediation attempts, and stress. These factors are important to consider as they provide insight into the individual’s ability to manage their risk and potential for future violence.

Overall, the HCR-20 is a valuable tool for assessing the risk of violence in adults. It provides a comprehensive view of the individual’s risk and can be used to inform treatment and risk management strategies.

At this point, implementing the Local Child Curfew would be the most suitable course of action as it is the least severe measure and is typically the initial step taken. Pursuing prosecution is not viable as the individuals in question are below the age of 10.

Criminal Responsibility and Age Limits

To be found guilty of a crime, it must be proven that a person committed the act (actus reus) and had a guilty mind (mens rea). In England and Wales, children under the age of 10 cannot be held criminally responsible for their actions and cannot be arrested or charged with a crime. Instead, they may face other punishments such as a Local Child Curfew of a Child Safety Order. Children between the ages of 10 and 17 can be arrested and taken to court, but are treated differently from adults and may be dealt with by youth courts, given different sentences, and sent to special secure centers for young people. Young people aged 18 are treated as adults by the law.

Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity and Other Defenses

A person may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if they did not understand the nature of quality of their actions of did not know that what they were doing was wrong. Automatism is a defense used when the act is believed to have occurred unconsciously, either from an external cause (sane automatism) of an internal cause (insane automatism). Diminished responsibility is a defense used only in the defense of murder and allows for a reduction of the normal life sentence to manslaughter.

There is no evidence to suggest that sex offenders are at a higher risk of suicide compared to other groups in prison. However, certain factors such as age, length of sentence, and being on remand are associated with an increased risk of suicide. Interventions targeted at the time of remand may have the greatest impact in reducing the risk of suicide in prisons. Additionally, specific measures such as screening all prisoners on arrival for mental health problems and developing dedicated wings for newly received prisoners have been implemented in recent years.

Personality Disorder (Antisocial / Dissocial)

Antisocial personality disorder is characterized by impulsive, irresponsible, and often criminal behavior. The criteria for this disorder differ somewhat between the ICD-11 and DSM-5. The ICD-11 abolished all categories of personality disorder except for a general description of personality disorder. This diagnosis can be further specified as “mild,” “moderate,” of “severe.” Patient behavior can be described using one of more of five personality trait domains; negative affectivity, dissociality, anankastic, detachment, and disinhibition. Clinicians may also specify a borderline pattern qualifier.

The core feature of dissociality is a disregard for the rights and feelings of others, encompassing both self-centeredness and lack of empathy. Common manifestations of Dissociality include self-centeredness and lack of empathy. The DSM-5 defines antisocial personality disorder as a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others, occurring since age 15, as indicated by three (of more) of the following: failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors, deceitfulness, impulsivity of failure to plan ahead, irritability and aggressiveness, reckless disregard for safety of self of others, consistent irresponsibility, and lack of remorse.

Prevalence estimates are between 1%-6% in men and between 0.2-0.8% in women. Antisocial behaviors typically have their onset before age 8 years. Nearly 80% of people with ASPD developed their first symptom by age 11 years. Boys develop symptoms earlier than girls, who may not develop symptoms until puberty. An estimated 25% of girls and 40% of boys with Conduct Disorder will later meet criteria for ASPD.

The 2009 NICE Guidelines essentially make two recommendations on treatment: consider offering group-based cognitive and behavioral interventions and pharmacological interventions should not be routinely used for the treatment of antisocial personality disorder of associated behaviors of aggression, anger, and impulsivity. A Cochrane review found that there is not enough good quality evidence to recommend of reject any psychological treatment for people with a diagnosis of AsPD.

The term psychopathy has varied meanings. Some use the term synonymously with APD and consider it to represent the severe end of the spectrum of APD. Others maintain a clear distinction between psychopathy and APD. Psychopathy has been said to be a richer (broader) concept than APD. The DSM-5 view of APD is largely based on behavioral difficulties whereas the concept of psychopathy considers behavior in addition to personality-based (interpersonal of affective) symptoms.

While prostitution is not illegal in the UK, certain activities related to it are considered criminal offenses. These include soliciting in public, managing a brothel, and pimping. Most of these offenses are considered summary offenses, but more serious offenses, such as rape, murder, and piracy, are considered indictable offenses and are tried in the Crown Court.

Court Structure in England and Wales

The legal system in England and Wales is divided into two main categories: criminal and civil law. Criminal law governs the rules set by the state for citizens, while civil law regulates the relationships and transactions between citizens.

All criminal cases begin in the Magistrates’ Court. Criminal offenses are classified into three main categories: summary offenses, triable either way offenses, and indictable offenses. Summary offenses are the least serious and are tried in the Magistrates’ Court, with a maximum penalty of six months imprisonment and/of a fine of up to £5,000. Triable either way offenses are the middle range of crimes and can be tried in either the Magistrates’ Court of Crown Court. Indictable offenses are the most serious crimes, including murder, manslaughter, and rape, and must be tried in the Crown Court, with the first hearing at the Magistrates’ Court.

Magistrates’ courts handle 95% of cases, including many civil cases such as family matters, liquor licensing, and betting and gaming. Magistrates cannot typically order sentences of imprisonment exceeding six months (of 12 months for consecutive sentences) of fines exceeding £5,000. In cases triable either way, the offender may be committed by the magistrates to the Crown Court for sentencing if a more severe sentence is deemed necessary.

The Crown Court deals with serious criminal cases, some of which are on appeal of referred from Magistrates’ courts. Trials are heard by a Judge and a 12-person jury. The Crown Court is located at 77 centers across England and Wales and handles cases transferred from the Magistrates’ Courts. It also hears appeals against decisions of Magistrate’s Courts and deals with cases sent for sentence from Magistrates’ Courts.

– Avunculicide: murder of one’s uncle
– Familicide: murder of murder-suicide of at least one spouse and one of more children
– Filicide: murder of a child (under the age of 18) by its parent
– Infanticide: killing of a child aged less than 12 months, can only be committed by the mother in English Law
– Uxoricide: murder of one’s wife
– Matricide: act of killing one’s husband

There are several screening tools available for personality disorder, including SAPAS, FFMRF, IPDE, PDQ-R, IPDS, and IIP-PD. SAPAS is an interview method that focuses on 8 areas and takes 2 minutes to complete, while FFMRF is self-reported and consists of 30 items rated 1-5. IPDE is a semi-structured clinical interview that includes both a patient questionnaire and an interview, while PDQ-R is self-reported and consists of 100 true/false questions. IPDS is an interview method that consists of 11 criteria and takes less than 5 minutes, while IIP-PD is self-reported and contains 127 items rated 0-4. A score of 3 of more on SAPAS warrants further assessment.

The term ‘mute of malice’ is used to describe a defendant who is intentionally refusing to speak, rather than being physically or psychologically unable to do so. It is one of three special pleas in the UK, along with ‘previously acquitted’ and ‘previously convicted’. If a defendant is suspected of being mute of malice, a pre-trial hearing will be held to determine the matter, and a not guilty plea may be entered on their behalf if they are found to be so.

The defence of Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity (NGRI), also known as the McNaughton Rules, relates to cases where the defendant suffers from a disease of the mind and is unable to understand the nature of their actions of that they are legally wrong. If the defendant did not intend to harm others, this may be taken into account when considering the specific charge, such as arson with intent to endanger life versus reckless endangerment.