-
Question 1
Incorrect
-
Regarding bias, which of the following statements is CORRECT:
Your Answer: Bias is only important if the results of a study show an association between two variables.
Correct Answer: Bias leads to the systematic difference between the results from a study and the true states of affair.
Explanation:Bias is the term used to describe an error at any stage of the study that was not due to chance. Bias leads to the systematic difference between the results from a study and the true states of affair. Bias may be introduced at all stages of the research process, from study design, through to analysis and publication. Bias can create a spurious association or mask a real association.Good research design can reduce the effect of bias (e.g. blinding, randomisation) but they cannot eliminate it completely. Increasing the sample size does not reduce bias.
-
This question is part of the following fields:
- Evidence Based Medicine
- Study Methodology
-
-
Question 2
Correct
-
Which of the following is NOT an advantage of a case-control study used to identify past exposure to a risk factor in patients with a disease:
Your Answer: Can directly measure absolute and relative risk of a disease
Explanation:Advantages:relatively quickrelatively cheap and easy to performparticularly suitable for studying associations between an exposure and an outcome when the outcome is uncommon or if the outcome occurs decades after exposurea wide range of risk factors can be investigated in each studyDisadvantages:subject to recall biasunlike in a whole population study, absolute risk cannot be quantifiedtemporal relationship between exposure and outcome can be difficult to establishunsuitable for rare risk factorsprone to confounding
-
This question is part of the following fields:
- Evidence Based Medicine
- Study Methodology
-
-
Question 3
Correct
-
Which of the following is NOT an advantage of a cohort study used to investigate the relationship between exposure to a risk factor and a future outcome:
Your Answer: Particularly suitable for rare diseases
Explanation:Advantages: ideal for studying associations between an exposure and an outcome when the exposure is uncommon, the time sequence of events can be assessed, they can provide information on a wide range of disease outcomes, the absolute and relative risk of disease can be measured directly, they can give a direct estimation of disease incidence ratesDisadvantages: costly and can take long periods of time if the outcome is delayed, subject to subject-selection and loss to follow-up bias, large sample size required for rare outcome of interest so it is not useful for rare diseases, prone to confounding
-
This question is part of the following fields:
- Evidence Based Medicine
- Study Methodology
-
-
Question 4
Correct
-
Regarding cross-sectional studies, which of the following statements is CORRECT:
Your Answer: They are particularly suitable for estimating point prevalence.
Explanation:Cross-sectional studies aim to provide data about population health, normal ranges of biological parameters, and disease prevalence or severity by observing the entire population, or a representative subset, at a single point in time. Cross-sectional studies are relatively simple and quick to perform and can be used to study multiple outcomes, but are subject to confounding and recall bias and are not suitable for studying rare diseases. Cross-sectional studies cannot be used to assess causation or to consider trends over time.
-
This question is part of the following fields:
- Evidence Based Medicine
- Study Methodology
-
-
Question 5
Incorrect
-
Regarding a cohort study, which of the following statements is INCORRECT:
Your Answer: It is subject to loss to follow up bias.
Correct Answer: It is useful for rare diseases.
Explanation:A cohort study is a longitudinal, prospective, observational study that follows a defined group (cohort) matched to unexposed controls for a set period of time and investigates the effect of exposure to a risk factor on a particular future outcome. The usual outcome measure is the relative risk (risk ratio). A large sample size is required for a rare outcome of interest so it is not useful for rare diseases.
-
This question is part of the following fields:
- Evidence Based Medicine
- Study Methodology
-
-
Question 6
Correct
-
Regarding a case-control study, which of the following statements is INCORRECT:
Your Answer: The usual outcome measure is the relative risk.
Explanation:A case-control study is a longitudinal, retrospective, observational study which investigates the relationship between a risk factor and one or more outcomes. This is done by selecting patients who already have a specific disease (cases), matching them to patients who do not (controls) and then collecting data from the patients to compare past exposure to a possible risk factor. The usual outcome measure is the odds ratio.
-
This question is part of the following fields:
- Evidence Based Medicine
- Study Methodology
-
-
Question 7
Correct
-
Which of the following best describes an intention to treat analysis:
Your Answer: All patients are included in the analysis according to the group into which they were randomised even if they are withdrawn from the study.
Explanation:An intention to treat (ITT) analysis is one in which all patients are included in the analysis, classified according to the group into which they were randomised, even if they were withdrawn from the study and did not actually receive the treatment, did not comply with treatment or drop-out. Intention to treat analysis is a more reliable estimate of true treatment effectiveness by replicating what happens in the ‘real world’ (e.g. noncompliance and protocol violations commonly affect therapies).
-
This question is part of the following fields:
- Evidence Based Medicine
- Study Methodology
-
-
Question 8
Correct
-
Funnel plots are typically used to display:
Your Answer: The existence of publication bias in meta-analysis
Explanation:Funnel plots are used to demonstrate the existence of publication bias in meta-analysis. Funnel plots are scatter plots of treatment effects estimated from individual studies on the x axis and some measure of study size on the y axis. Each point on the graph represents one of the studies. A symmetrical inverted funnel shape indicates an absence of publication bias. If there is publication bias, there will be asymmetry of the open wide end due to the absence of small negative results.
-
This question is part of the following fields:
- Evidence Based Medicine
- Study Methodology
-
SESSION STATS - PERFORMANCE PER SPECIALTY
