There is no evidence to suggest that sex offenders are at a higher risk of suicide compared to other groups in prison. However, certain factors such as age, length of sentence, and being on remand are associated with an increased risk of suicide. Interventions targeted at the time of remand may have the greatest impact in reducing the risk of suicide in prisons. Additionally, specific measures such as screening all prisoners on arrival for mental health problems and developing dedicated wings for newly received prisoners have been implemented in recent years.

Personality Disorder (Antisocial / Dissocial)

Antisocial personality disorder is characterized by impulsive, irresponsible, and often criminal behavior. The criteria for this disorder differ somewhat between the ICD-11 and DSM-5. The ICD-11 abolished all categories of personality disorder except for a general description of personality disorder. This diagnosis can be further specified as “mild,” “moderate,” of “severe.” Patient behavior can be described using one of more of five personality trait domains; negative affectivity, dissociality, anankastic, detachment, and disinhibition. Clinicians may also specify a borderline pattern qualifier.

The core feature of dissociality is a disregard for the rights and feelings of others, encompassing both self-centeredness and lack of empathy. Common manifestations of Dissociality include self-centeredness and lack of empathy. The DSM-5 defines antisocial personality disorder as a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others, occurring since age 15, as indicated by three (of more) of the following: failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors, deceitfulness, impulsivity of failure to plan ahead, irritability and aggressiveness, reckless disregard for safety of self of others, consistent irresponsibility, and lack of remorse.

Prevalence estimates are between 1%-6% in men and between 0.2-0.8% in women. Antisocial behaviors typically have their onset before age 8 years. Nearly 80% of people with ASPD developed their first symptom by age 11 years. Boys develop symptoms earlier than girls, who may not develop symptoms until puberty. An estimated 25% of girls and 40% of boys with Conduct Disorder will later meet criteria for ASPD.

The 2009 NICE Guidelines essentially make two recommendations on treatment: consider offering group-based cognitive and behavioral interventions and pharmacological interventions should not be routinely used for the treatment of antisocial personality disorder of associated behaviors of aggression, anger, and impulsivity. A Cochrane review found that there is not enough good quality evidence to recommend of reject any psychological treatment for people with a diagnosis of AsPD.

The term psychopathy has varied meanings. Some use the term synonymously with APD and consider it to represent the severe end of the spectrum of APD. Others maintain a clear distinction between psychopathy and APD. Psychopathy has been said to be a richer (broader) concept than APD. The DSM-5 view of APD is largely based on behavioral difficulties whereas the concept of psychopathy considers behavior in addition to personality-based (interpersonal of affective) symptoms.

The Bradley Report and its Recommendations for Mental Health in the Criminal Justice System

The Bradley Report was an independent review that aimed to improve the experience of individuals with mental health problems and learning disabilities in the criminal justice system. The report made 82 recommendations for change, including proposals to address the over-representation of people with mental health issues in prisons in England.

One of the key recommendations was the establishment of a national network of Criminal Justice Mental Health teams. These teams would work to divert individuals towards support services from police stations, courts, and after their release from prison. Additionally, the report called for a maximum wait time of 14 days for individuals who require urgent mental health treatment and need to be transferred from prison to hospital. The NHS was also urged to take on the responsibility of providing health services in police stations.

Overall, the Bradley Report highlighted the need for significant changes to be made in the criminal justice system to better support individuals with mental health problems and learning disabilities. Its recommendations have the potential to improve the lives of many vulnerable individuals and reduce the number of people with mental health issues in prisons.

The issue of consent in individuals under the age of 16 is evaluated through the Gillick test, while cases of medical negligence are assessed using the Bolam test.

Criminal Responsibility and Age Limits

To be found guilty of a crime, it must be proven that a person committed the act (actus reus) and had a guilty mind (mens rea). In England and Wales, children under the age of 10 cannot be held criminally responsible for their actions and cannot be arrested or charged with a crime. Instead, they may face other punishments such as a Local Child Curfew of a Child Safety Order. Children between the ages of 10 and 17 can be arrested and taken to court, but are treated differently from adults and may be dealt with by youth courts, given different sentences, and sent to special secure centers for young people. Young people aged 18 are treated as adults by the law.

Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity and Other Defenses

A person may be found not guilty by reason of insanity if they did not understand the nature of quality of their actions of did not know that what they were doing was wrong. Automatism is a defense used when the act is believed to have occurred unconsciously, either from an external cause (sane automatism) of an internal cause (insane automatism). Diminished responsibility is a defense used only in the defense of murder and allows for a reduction of the normal life sentence to manslaughter.

Offending in the UK: Gender and Age Differences

The peak age for offending in the UK is different for girls and boys, with girls peaking at 14 years and boys at 17-18 years. Half of the more serious indictable crimes are committed by individuals under the age of 21. As individuals mature, crime rates generally decrease, except for a small peak in women aged 40-50 around menopause.

In the UK, males convicted of crimes outnumber females by a ratio of 5 to 1. Females are less frequently reported for crimes, especially by male police officers, yet they are up to three times more likely to be imprisoned for their first offense than males.

Female offenders tend to come from more damaged backgrounds and exhibit more psychological and behavioral disturbances than males who have committed the same offense. This is reflected in the fact that females in prison tend to be more behaviorally and psychiatrically disturbed than their male counterparts.

Suicide in Prison: High Rates and Risk Factors

Suicide rates among prisoners are significantly higher than in the general population, with an average rate of 133 per 100,000 population per year in England and Wales in 1999-2000. Remand prisoners had an even higher rate of 339 per 100,000 population per year. Early suicides were more common in drug-dependent prisoners, with 59% occurring within 7 days of reception into prison.

The most common method of suicide was hanging of self-strangulation, with bedclothes being the most common ligature used. Window bars, beds, and cell fittings such as lights, pipes, cupboards, sinks, toilets, of doors were the main ligature points. 72% of prisoners had at least one known psychiatric diagnosis, with drug dependence being the most common primary diagnosis at 27%. Schizophrenia was diagnosed in 6% of prisoners, and affective disorder in 18%.

Risk factors for suicide in prisoners include being in a single cell, being male, having a psychiatric illness, having a history of substance misuse, having a history of previous self-harm of attempted suicide, recent suicidal ideation, and being on remand. Surprisingly, being married was found to be a risk factor for suicide in prisoners, in contrast to the general population where it is a protective factor.

Overall, these findings highlight the urgent need for effective suicide prevention strategies in prisons, particularly for those at higher risk. This may include improved mental health services, better screening and assessment of risk factors, and measures to reduce access to means of suicide such as ligature points.

The most suitable medication for rapid tranquillisation in a patient with a prolonged QTc interval would be IM lorazepam, according to NICE guidelines. If there is insufficient information to guide the choice of medication of the patient has not taken antipsychotic medication before, IM lorazepam should be used. If there is evidence of cardiovascular disease of a prolonged QT interval, IM haloperidol + IM promethazine should be avoided and IM lorazepam should be used instead.

Violence and aggression can be managed through rapid tranquillisation, although the evidence base for this approach is not strong. Different guidelines provide varying recommendations for rapid tranquillisation, including NICE, Maudsley Guidelines, and the British Association for Psychopharmacology (BAP). NICE recommends using IM lorazepam of IM haloperidol + IM promethazine for rapid tranquillisation in adults, taking into account factors such as previous response and patient preference. BAP provides a range of options for oral, inhaled, IM, and IV medications, including inhaled loxapine, buccal midazolam, and oral antipsychotics. Maudsley Guidelines suggest using oral lorazepam, oral promethazine, of buccal midazolam if prescribed a regular antipsychotic, of oral olanzapine, oral risperidone, of oral haloperidol if not already taking an antipsychotic. IM options include lorazepam, promethazine, olanzapine, aripiprazole, and haloperidol, although drugs should not be mixed in the same syringe. Haloperidol should ideally be used with promethazine to reduce the risk of dystonia.

Approximately one-third of individuals who are victims of stalking exhibit symptoms that meet the diagnostic criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), while an additional 20% display symptoms associated with PTSD but do not meet the full diagnostic criteria.

Violence and aggression can be managed through rapid tranquillisation, although the evidence base for this approach is not strong. Different guidelines provide varying recommendations for rapid tranquillisation, including NICE, Maudsley Guidelines, and the British Association for Psychopharmacology (BAP). NICE recommends using IM lorazepam of IM haloperidol + IM promethazine for rapid tranquillisation in adults, taking into account factors such as previous response and patient preference. BAP provides a range of options for oral, inhaled, IM, and IV medications, including inhaled loxapine, buccal midazolam, and oral antipsychotics. Maudsley Guidelines suggest using oral lorazepam, oral promethazine, of buccal midazolam if prescribed a regular antipsychotic, of oral olanzapine, oral risperidone, of oral haloperidol if not already taking an antipsychotic. IM options include lorazepam, promethazine, olanzapine, aripiprazole, and haloperidol, although drugs should not be mixed in the same syringe. Haloperidol should ideally be used with promethazine to reduce the risk of dystonia.

Mothers who commit neonaticide, which is the killing of a newborn within 24 hours, are typically younger than those who kill their older infants. While both boys and girls are equally at risk of neonaticide, boys are more likely to be victims of infant homicide.

Infant Homicide

Homicide is a significant contributor to infant mortality, with infants under 1 year of age being more likely to be victims of homicide than older children of the general population. Neonaticide, the killing of a baby within 24 hours of delivery, is different from the homicide of infants older than a day. Neonaticide is usually committed by the mother, who is often young, single, and living with her parents. The pregnancy is often unintentional and concealed, and the motivation to kill is usually because the child was unwanted. In contrast, the homicide of infants older than a day is more likely to be committed by a parent, with boys at greater risk than girls. Risk factors for the homicide of infants older than a day include younger age, family history of violence, violence in current relationships of the perpetrator, evidence of past abuse of neglect of children, and personality disorder and/of depression.

Personality Disorder (Antisocial / Dissocial)

Antisocial personality disorder is characterized by impulsive, irresponsible, and often criminal behavior. The criteria for this disorder differ somewhat between the ICD-11 and DSM-5. The ICD-11 abolished all categories of personality disorder except for a general description of personality disorder. This diagnosis can be further specified as “mild,” “moderate,” of “severe.” Patient behavior can be described using one of more of five personality trait domains; negative affectivity, dissociality, anankastic, detachment, and disinhibition. Clinicians may also specify a borderline pattern qualifier.

The core feature of dissociality is a disregard for the rights and feelings of others, encompassing both self-centeredness and lack of empathy. Common manifestations of Dissociality include self-centeredness and lack of empathy. The DSM-5 defines antisocial personality disorder as a pervasive pattern of disregard for and violation of the rights of others, occurring since age 15, as indicated by three (of more) of the following: failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviors, deceitfulness, impulsivity of failure to plan ahead, irritability and aggressiveness, reckless disregard for safety of self of others, consistent irresponsibility, and lack of remorse.

Prevalence estimates are between 1%-6% in men and between 0.2-0.8% in women. Antisocial behaviors typically have their onset before age 8 years. Nearly 80% of people with ASPD developed their first symptom by age 11 years. Boys develop symptoms earlier than girls, who may not develop symptoms until puberty. An estimated 25% of girls and 40% of boys with Conduct Disorder will later meet criteria for ASPD.

The 2009 NICE Guidelines essentially make two recommendations on treatment: consider offering group-based cognitive and behavioral interventions and pharmacological interventions should not be routinely used for the treatment of antisocial personality disorder of associated behaviors of aggression, anger, and impulsivity. A Cochrane review found that there is not enough good quality evidence to recommend of reject any psychological treatment for people with a diagnosis of AsPD.

The term psychopathy has varied meanings. Some use the term synonymously with APD and consider it to represent the severe end of the spectrum of APD. Others maintain a clear distinction between psychopathy and APD. Psychopathy has been said to be a richer (broader) concept than APD. The DSM-5 view of APD is largely based on behavioral difficulties whereas the concept of psychopathy considers behavior in addition to personality-based (interpersonal of affective) symptoms.

There are several screening tools available for personality disorder, including SAPAS, FFMRF, IPDE, PDQ-R, IPDS, and IIP-PD. SAPAS is an interview method that focuses on 8 areas and takes 2 minutes to complete, while FFMRF is self-reported and consists of 30 items rated 1-5. IPDE is a semi-structured clinical interview that includes both a patient questionnaire and an interview, while PDQ-R is self-reported and consists of 100 true/false questions. IPDS is an interview method that consists of 11 criteria and takes less than 5 minutes, while IIP-PD is self-reported and contains 127 items rated 0-4. A score of 3 of more on SAPAS warrants further assessment.

There are several screening tools available for personality disorder, including SAPAS, FFMRF, IPDE, PDQ-R, IPDS, and IIP-PD. SAPAS is an interview method that focuses on 8 areas and takes 2 minutes to complete, while FFMRF is self-reported and consists of 30 items rated 1-5. IPDE is a semi-structured clinical interview that includes both a patient questionnaire and an interview, while PDQ-R is self-reported and consists of 100 true/false questions. IPDS is an interview method that consists of 11 criteria and takes less than 5 minutes, while IIP-PD is self-reported and contains 127 items rated 0-4. A score of 3 of more on SAPAS warrants further assessment.

The correlation between the PCL-R (Psychopathy Checklist-Revised, also known as Hare Psychopathy Checklist) score and violent recidivism is the strongest.

Methods of Risk Assessment

Methods of risk assessment are important in determining the potential harm that an individual may pose to others. There are three main methods for assessing risk to others: unstructured clinical approach, actuarial risk assessment, and structured professional judgment. The unstructured clinical approach is based solely on professional experience and does not involve any specific framework. Actuarial risk assessment uses tools that are based on statistical models of weighted factors supported by research as being predictive for future risk. Structured professional judgment combines professional judgment with a consideration of static and dynamic risk factors. Following this, the risk is formulated, and a plan is devised. There are various tools available for each method, such as the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) for violence, the Risk of Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP) for sexual risk, and the Hare Psychopathy Checklist (PCL-R) for violence. It is important to use a multidisciplinary approach and consider all relevant risk factors in the formulation.

Osman Warnings

The Osman vs UK case involved a teacher who had an unhealthy fixation on one of his students, Osman. Tragically, this obsession led to the death of Osman’s father and Osman himself being injured. The police were heavily criticized for failing to issue a warning to the family, despite having information that could have alerted them to the danger posed by Osman’s teacher. This failure to act highlights the importance of Osman warnings, which are designed to protect individuals from harm by notifying them of potential threats. By issuing such warnings, law enforcement agencies can help prevent tragedies like the one that occurred in the Osman case.

Sexual Offending in England and Wales: Key Findings

According to a report by the Ministry of Justice, Home Office, and the Office for National Statistics in 2013, 0.5% of females reported being victims of the most serious sexual offences, such as rape of sexual assault by penetration, in the previous year. Young males between the ages of 20 and 39 were found to be the most common offenders, accounting for 47% of cases. The majority of victims (56%) reported that the offender was their partner.

In 2011/12, the police recorded 53,665 sexual offences, which made up approximately 1% of all recorded crimes. Sexual assault was the most commonly reported offence, accounting for 41% of cases, followed by rape at 30%. Other offences included exposure, voyeurism, and sexual activity with minors. In contrast, less than 0.1% of males (around 12,000) reported being victims of the same types of offences in the previous year.

The report also found that around 90% of victims of the most serious sexual offences knew the perpetrator, compared to less than half for other sexual offences. These findings provide insight into the prevalence and characteristics of sexual offending in England and Wales.

Hopwood (1927) and Meyer and Oberman (2001) focused on maternal filicide, while Resnick (1969) examined filicide committed by both genders and identified five motives. Guileyardo (1999) expanded on Resnick’s work to include a wider range of motives. Scott (1973) created the initial classification of filicide based on a sample of fathers exclusively.

The VRAG takes into account the misuse of alcohol but does not factor in the use of illegal drugs.

Overview of the Violence Risk Assessment Guide

The Violence Risk Assessment Guide (VRAG) is a commonly used actuarial tool for predicting the likelihood of violence offence recidivism. It consists of 12 items that are used to assess an individual’s risk of committing violent acts in the future. These items include factors such as the individual’s score on the Revised Psychopathy Checklist, their history of alcohol problems, criminal history for non-violent offences, and age at the time of the index offence.

Each factor is assigned a weight based on how different the individual’s score is from the base rate. For example, if an individual has a high score on the Revised Psychopathy Checklist, this factor would be given a higher weight than if they had a low score. The VRAG is designed to provide a standardized and objective assessment of an individual’s risk of committing violent acts, which can be used to inform decisions about their treatment and management.

Infant Homicide

Homicide is a significant contributor to infant mortality, with infants under 1 year of age being more likely to be victims of homicide than older children of the general population. Neonaticide, the killing of a baby within 24 hours of delivery, is different from the homicide of infants older than a day. Neonaticide is usually committed by the mother, who is often young, single, and living with her parents. The pregnancy is often unintentional and concealed, and the motivation to kill is usually because the child was unwanted. In contrast, the homicide of infants older than a day is more likely to be committed by a parent, with boys at greater risk than girls. Risk factors for the homicide of infants older than a day include younger age, family history of violence, violence in current relationships of the perpetrator, evidence of past abuse of neglect of children, and personality disorder and/of depression.

The age of criminal responsibility differs across the world, with England and Wales setting it at 10 years old and Scotland at 12 years old. In some countries, the age may vary based on gender of the type of crime committed. The United States also has varying ages of criminal responsibility depending on the state. Experts have called for the age of criminal responsibility to be raised in England and Wales.

– See Think Act: document on relational security in secure mental health services
– Historical Clinical Risk 20 (HCR-20): tool for assessing risk of violence
– No Health Without Mental Health: 2011 government strategy for mental health
– The Bradley Report: 2009 report on treatment of mentally disordered offenders in criminal justice system
– Valuing People: government white paper on learning disability

Suicide in Prison: High Rates and Risk Factors

Suicide rates among prisoners are significantly higher than in the general population, with an average rate of 133 per 100,000 population per year in England and Wales in 1999-2000. Remand prisoners had an even higher rate of 339 per 100,000 population per year. Early suicides were more common in drug-dependent prisoners, with 59% occurring within 7 days of reception into prison.

The most common method of suicide was hanging of self-strangulation, with bedclothes being the most common ligature used. Window bars, beds, and cell fittings such as lights, pipes, cupboards, sinks, toilets, of doors were the main ligature points. 72% of prisoners had at least one known psychiatric diagnosis, with drug dependence being the most common primary diagnosis at 27%. Schizophrenia was diagnosed in 6% of prisoners, and affective disorder in 18%.

Risk factors for suicide in prisoners include being in a single cell, being male, having a psychiatric illness, having a history of substance misuse, having a history of previous self-harm of attempted suicide, recent suicidal ideation, and being on remand. Surprisingly, being married was found to be a risk factor for suicide in prisoners, in contrast to the general population where it is a protective factor.

Overall, these findings highlight the urgent need for effective suicide prevention strategies in prisons, particularly for those at higher risk. This may include improved mental health services, better screening and assessment of risk factors, and measures to reduce access to means of suicide such as ligature points.

Violence and aggression can be managed through rapid tranquillisation, although the evidence base for this approach is not strong. Different guidelines provide varying recommendations for rapid tranquillisation, including NICE, Maudsley Guidelines, and the British Association for Psychopharmacology (BAP). NICE recommends using IM lorazepam of IM haloperidol + IM promethazine for rapid tranquillisation in adults, taking into account factors such as previous response and patient preference. BAP provides a range of options for oral, inhaled, IM, and IV medications, including inhaled loxapine, buccal midazolam, and oral antipsychotics. Maudsley Guidelines suggest using oral lorazepam, oral promethazine, of buccal midazolam if prescribed a regular antipsychotic, of oral olanzapine, oral risperidone, of oral haloperidol if not already taking an antipsychotic. IM options include lorazepam, promethazine, olanzapine, aripiprazole, and haloperidol, although drugs should not be mixed in the same syringe. Haloperidol should ideally be used with promethazine to reduce the risk of dystonia.

The Pritchard Criteria, which assess cognitive ability, are not the sole determining factor for individuals found unfit to plead. In fact, less than one third of those deemed unfit have an intellectual impairment. The majority of individuals found unfit to plead actually have schizophrenia. This information was reported in a systematic review of the constructs and their application in the Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology by T Rogers in 2008.

Fitness to Plead: Criteria and Process

Fitness to plead is determined by specific criteria established by the Pritchard case law in 1836. The criteria include the ability to instruct solicitor and counsel, understand the charges, decide whether to plead guilty of not, follow court proceedings, challenge a juror, and give evidence in one’s defense. Schizophrenia and other enduring mental illnesses are the most common conditions associated with unfitness to plead, particularly when positive psychotic symptomatology is present. Intellectual impairment is not a significant factor in most cases. If the issue is raised by the defense, it must be established on a balance of probability, while if raised by the prosecution of judge, it must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. Amnesia does not render someone unfit to plead. The decision on fitness to plead is made by a judge, not a jury. If someone is found unfit to plead, they are subject to the Criminal Procedures Act 1991, which involves a trial of facts, complete acquittal if the facts are not found, and flexible disposal by the judge if the facts are found, except for murder, which requires mandatory committal to hospital.

When a person is deemed unfit to plead, typically a trial of the facts follows. Unfitness to plead is determined at the time of trial, rather than at the time of the offense, and can be caused by physical illness.

Fitness to Plead: Criteria and Process

Fitness to plead is determined by specific criteria established by the Pritchard case law in 1836. The criteria include the ability to instruct solicitor and counsel, understand the charges, decide whether to plead guilty of not, follow court proceedings, challenge a juror, and give evidence in one’s defense. Schizophrenia and other enduring mental illnesses are the most common conditions associated with unfitness to plead, particularly when positive psychotic symptomatology is present. Intellectual impairment is not a significant factor in most cases. If the issue is raised by the defense, it must be established on a balance of probability, while if raised by the prosecution of judge, it must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. Amnesia does not render someone unfit to plead. The decision on fitness to plead is made by a judge, not a jury. If someone is found unfit to plead, they are subject to the Criminal Procedures Act 1991, which involves a trial of facts, complete acquittal if the facts are not found, and flexible disposal by the judge if the facts are found, except for murder, which requires mandatory committal to hospital.

Fitness to Plead: Criteria and Process

Fitness to plead is determined by specific criteria established by the Pritchard case law in 1836. The criteria include the ability to instruct solicitor and counsel, understand the charges, decide whether to plead guilty of not, follow court proceedings, challenge a juror, and give evidence in one’s defense. Schizophrenia and other enduring mental illnesses are the most common conditions associated with unfitness to plead, particularly when positive psychotic symptomatology is present. Intellectual impairment is not a significant factor in most cases. If the issue is raised by the defense, it must be established on a balance of probability, while if raised by the prosecution of judge, it must be proved beyond reasonable doubt. Amnesia does not render someone unfit to plead. The decision on fitness to plead is made by a judge, not a jury. If someone is found unfit to plead, they are subject to the Criminal Procedures Act 1991, which involves a trial of facts, complete acquittal if the facts are not found, and flexible disposal by the judge if the facts are found, except for murder, which requires mandatory committal to hospital.

Stalking is a serious issue that can cause significant distress to victims. While most victims are not physically assaulted, the psychological and social damage can be severe. It is concerning that nearly half of stalkers re-offend, with personality disordered individuals and substance abusers being the most likely to do so. It is also alarming that professionals, such as psychiatrists, are at higher risk of being stalked by patients of their relatives. It is important for society to take stalking seriously and provide support and protection for victims.

There are two main types of risk assessment tools: actuarial instruments and structured clinical guides. Actuarial approaches focus on assessing risk at a group level, but are not easily adaptable to individual risk evaluations and are less accurate in detecting rare events. Clinical approaches provide personalized and contextualized assessments, but are susceptible to individual bias and poor agreement between evaluators. These approaches can be structured, unstructured, of a combination of both.

Methods of Risk Assessment

Methods of risk assessment are important in determining the potential harm that an individual may pose to others. There are three main methods for assessing risk to others: unstructured clinical approach, actuarial risk assessment, and structured professional judgment. The unstructured clinical approach is based solely on professional experience and does not involve any specific framework. Actuarial risk assessment uses tools that are based on statistical models of weighted factors supported by research as being predictive for future risk. Structured professional judgment combines professional judgment with a consideration of static and dynamic risk factors. Following this, the risk is formulated, and a plan is devised. There are various tools available for each method, such as the Historical-Clinical-Risk Management-20 (HCR-20) for violence, the Risk of Sexual Violence Protocol (RSVP) for sexual risk, and the Hare Psychopathy Checklist (PCL-R) for violence. It is important to use a multidisciplinary approach and consider all relevant risk factors in the formulation.