In cases where pregnant women experience severe nausea and vomiting leading to ketonuria and dehydration, admission to the hospital should be considered. This is especially true if they have already tried oral anti-emetics without success. Such symptoms are indicative of hyperemesis gravidarum, which can be confirmed by urine dipstick and increased blood urea levels. While pyridoxine is not recommended by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), ondansetron is effective as a second-line option. However, inpatient treatment is necessary. Gastroscopy is unlikely to be helpful at this stage, even if there is a small amount of blood in the vomit, which is likely due to a Mallory-Weiss tear caused by constant retching. Low K+ levels due to vomiting need to be replaced, and anti-emetics are necessary. Therefore, admission to the hospital for IV fluids, anti-emetics, and a trial of a bland diet is the appropriate course of action.

Hyperemesis gravidarum is an extreme form of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy that occurs in around 1% of pregnancies and is most common between 8 and 12 weeks. It is associated with raised beta hCG levels and can be caused by multiple pregnancies, trophoblastic disease, hyperthyroidism, nulliparity, and obesity. Referral criteria for nausea and vomiting in pregnancy include continued symptoms with ketonuria and/or weight loss, a confirmed or suspected comorbidity, and inability to keep down liquids or oral antiemetics. The diagnosis of hyperemesis gravidarum requires the presence of 5% pre-pregnancy weight loss, dehydration, and electrolyte imbalance. Management includes first-line use of antihistamines and oral cyclizine or promethazine, with second-line options of ondansetron and metoclopramide. Admission may be needed for IV hydration. Complications can include Wernicke’s encephalopathy, Mallory-Weiss tear, central pontine myelinolysis, acute tubular necrosis, and fetal growth issues.

This pregnant woman is experiencing painful uterine contractions and has developed disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), which is characterized by thrombocytopenia, increased PT and PTT, elevated D-dimer, and the presence of schistocytes in a peripheral blood smear. Although she is not experiencing vaginal bleeding, the most likely cause of her DIC is placental abruption, which can occur without visible bleeding. Placental abruption presents with sudden-onset abdominal pain, contractions, vaginal bleeding, and decreased fetal movement. If there is any fetal or maternal compromise, the fetus needs to be delivered by Caesarean section as soon as possible to prevent fetal or maternal demise. DIC can present with bleeding from multiple sites, extensive bruising, low blood pressure, reduced capillary refill time, or sudden onset of high temperature, general malaise, and purpura. Management includes removing the precipitant (e.g., retained placenta) and blood products such as fibrinogen and cryoprecipitate. Other potential causes of DIC, such as lower limb deep venous thrombosis, pelvic thrombophlebitis, urinary tract infection, and sepsis, are less likely in this pregnant woman in the third trimester.

Medical treatments available for managing postpartum haemorrhage caused by uterine atony include oxytocin, ergometrine, carboprost, and misoprostol.

The correct option for this patient is IV oxytocin. The patient is experiencing primary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), which is characterized by the loss of more than 500 ml of blood within 24 hours of delivering the baby. Uterine atony, which occurs when the uterus fails to contract after the placenta is delivered, is the most common cause of PPH. The initial steps in managing this condition involve an ABCDE approach, establishing IV access, and resuscitation. Mechanical palpation of the uterine fundus (rubbing the uterus) is also done to stimulate contractions, but it has not been successful in this case. The next step is pharmacological management, which involves administering IV oxytocin.

IM carboprost is not the correct option. Although it is another medical management option, it should be avoided in patients with asthma, which this patient has.

IV carboprost is also not the correct option. Carboprost is given intramuscularly, not intravenously. Additionally, it should be avoided in patients with asthma.

Understanding Postpartum Haemorrhage

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a condition where a woman experiences blood loss of more than 500 ml after giving birth vaginally. It can be classified as primary or secondary. Primary PPH occurs within 24 hours after delivery and is caused by the 4 Ts: tone, trauma, tissue, and thrombin. The most common cause is uterine atony. Risk factors for primary PPH include previous PPH, prolonged labour, pre-eclampsia, increased maternal age, emergency Caesarean section, and placenta praevia.

In managing PPH, it is important to involve senior staff immediately and follow the ABC approach. This includes two peripheral cannulae, lying the woman flat, blood tests, and commencing a warmed crystalloid infusion. Mechanical interventions such as rubbing up the fundus and catheterisation are also done. Medical interventions include IV oxytocin, ergometrine, carboprost, and misoprostol. Surgical options such as intrauterine balloon tamponade, B-Lynch suture, ligation of uterine arteries, and hysterectomy may be considered if medical options fail to control the bleeding.

Secondary PPH occurs between 24 hours to 6 weeks after delivery and is typically due to retained placental tissue or endometritis. It is important to understand the causes and risk factors of PPH to prevent and manage this life-threatening emergency effectively.

To treat postpartum haemorrhage caused by uterine atony, medical options include oxytocin, ergometrine, carboprost, and misoprostol.

The leading cause of primary postpartum haemorrhage is uterine atony. The RCOG has issued guidelines (Green-top Guideline No.52) for managing primary PPH due to uterine atony. The first-line treatment recommended is 5U of IV Syntocinon (oxytocin), followed by 0.5 mg of ergometrine.

Understanding Postpartum Haemorrhage

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a condition where a woman experiences blood loss of more than 500 ml after giving birth vaginally. It can be classified as primary or secondary. Primary PPH occurs within 24 hours after delivery and is caused by the 4 Ts: tone, trauma, tissue, and thrombin. The most common cause is uterine atony. Risk factors for primary PPH include previous PPH, prolonged labour, pre-eclampsia, increased maternal age, emergency Caesarean section, and placenta praevia.

In managing PPH, it is important to involve senior staff immediately and follow the ABC approach. This includes two peripheral cannulae, lying the woman flat, blood tests, and commencing a warmed crystalloid infusion. Mechanical interventions such as rubbing up the fundus and catheterisation are also done. Medical interventions include IV oxytocin, ergometrine, carboprost, and misoprostol. Surgical options such as intrauterine balloon tamponade, B-Lynch suture, ligation of uterine arteries, and hysterectomy may be considered if medical options fail to control the bleeding.

Secondary PPH occurs between 24 hours to 6 weeks after delivery and is typically due to retained placental tissue or endometritis. It is important to understand the causes and risk factors of PPH to prevent and manage this life-threatening emergency effectively.

The most appropriate action for managing umbilical cord prolapse is to insert a urinary catheter and fill the bladder with saline, which can help lift the presenting part off the cord. Alternatively, the presenting part can be manually lifted to prevent cord compression. Applying suprapubic pressure is not the correct management for cord prolapse, as it is used for shoulder dystocia. Administering IV oxytocin is not recommended, as it can induce contractions. Tocolytics such as terbutaline or nifedipine can be used to relax the uterus and delay delivery while transferring the patient to theatre for a caesarian section. Episiotomy may be used in the management of shoulder dystocia, but it is not appropriate for cord prolapse. Pushing the cord back inside the vagina is not recommended, as it can cause vasospasm and lead to foetal hypoxia.

Understanding Umbilical Cord Prolapse

Umbilical cord prolapse is a rare but serious complication that can occur during delivery. It happens when the umbilical cord descends ahead of the presenting part of the fetus, which can lead to compression or spasm of the cord. This can cause fetal hypoxia and potentially irreversible damage or death. Certain factors increase the risk of cord prolapse, such as prematurity, multiparity, polyhydramnios, twin pregnancy, cephalopelvic disproportion, and abnormal presentations like breech or transverse lie.

Around half of all cord prolapses occur when the membranes are artificially ruptured. Diagnosis is usually made when the fetal heart rate becomes abnormal and the cord is palpable vaginally or visible beyond the introitus. Cord prolapse is an obstetric emergency that requires immediate management. The presenting part of the fetus may be pushed back into the uterus to avoid compression, and the cord should be kept warm and moist to prevent vasospasm. The patient may be asked to go on all fours or assume the left lateral position until preparations for an immediate caesarian section have been carried out. Tocolytics may be used to reduce uterine contractions, and retrofilling the bladder with saline can help elevate the presenting part. Although caesarian section is the usual first-line method of delivery, an instrumental vaginal delivery may be possible if the cervix is fully dilated and the head is low.

In conclusion, umbilical cord prolapse is a rare but serious complication that requires prompt recognition and management. Understanding the risk factors and appropriate interventions can help reduce the incidence of fetal mortality associated with this condition.

The most probable reason for umbilical cord prolapse is artificial rupture of membranes. Factors such as cephalic presentation, nulliparity, and prolonged pregnancy decrease the chances of cord prolapse. Prostaglandins do not significantly affect the risk of cord prolapse.

Understanding Umbilical Cord Prolapse

Umbilical cord prolapse is a rare but serious complication that can occur during delivery. It happens when the umbilical cord descends ahead of the presenting part of the fetus, which can lead to compression or spasm of the cord. This can cause fetal hypoxia and potentially irreversible damage or death. Certain factors increase the risk of cord prolapse, such as prematurity, multiparity, polyhydramnios, twin pregnancy, cephalopelvic disproportion, and abnormal presentations like breech or transverse lie.

Around half of all cord prolapses occur when the membranes are artificially ruptured. Diagnosis is usually made when the fetal heart rate becomes abnormal and the cord is palpable vaginally or visible beyond the introitus. Cord prolapse is an obstetric emergency that requires immediate management. The presenting part of the fetus may be pushed back into the uterus to avoid compression, and the cord should be kept warm and moist to prevent vasospasm. The patient may be asked to go on all fours or assume the left lateral position until preparations for an immediate caesarian section have been carried out. Tocolytics may be used to reduce uterine contractions, and retrofilling the bladder with saline can help elevate the presenting part. Although caesarian section is the usual first-line method of delivery, an instrumental vaginal delivery may be possible if the cervix is fully dilated and the head is low.

In conclusion, umbilical cord prolapse is a rare but serious complication that requires prompt recognition and management. Understanding the risk factors and appropriate interventions can help reduce the incidence of fetal mortality associated with this condition.

Having had one previous caesarean section, the majority of women can have a successful vaginal delivery. A fundal placenta, which is attached at the top of the uterus away from the cervical os, is a favorable location for a placenta and does not require a caesarean section. However, a previous caesarean section does increase the risk of placenta praevia, where the placenta covers the cervical os, which may require a caesarean section. Inducing vaginal delivery at 36-37 weeks is not recommended in this case, as it is not a suitable option. While maternal age of 37 may pose some risks during pregnancy and birth, it is not a determining factor for a caesarean section unless there are other concerns.

Caesarean Section: Types, Indications, and Risks

Caesarean section, also known as C-section, is a surgical procedure that involves delivering a baby through an incision in the mother’s abdomen and uterus. In recent years, the rate of C-section has increased significantly due to an increased fear of litigation. There are two main types of C-section: lower segment C-section, which comprises 99% of cases, and classic C-section, which involves a longitudinal incision in the upper segment of the uterus.

C-section may be indicated for various reasons, including absolute cephalopelvic disproportion, placenta praevia grades 3/4, pre-eclampsia, post-maturity, IUGR, fetal distress in labor/prolapsed cord, failure of labor to progress, malpresentations, placental abruption, vaginal infection, and cervical cancer. The urgency of C-section may be categorized into four categories, with Category 1 being the most urgent and Category 4 being elective.

It is important for clinicians to inform women of the serious and frequent risks associated with C-section, including emergency hysterectomy, need for further surgery, admission to intensive care unit, thromboembolic disease, bladder injury, ureteric injury, and death. C-section may also increase the risk of uterine rupture, antepartum stillbirth, placenta praevia, and placenta accreta in subsequent pregnancies. Other complications may include persistent wound and abdominal discomfort, increased risk of repeat C-section, readmission to hospital, haemorrhage, infection, and fetal lacerations.

Vaginal birth after C-section (VBAC) may be an appropriate method of delivery for pregnant women with a single previous C-section delivery, except for those with previous uterine rupture or classical C-section scar. The success rate of VBAC is around 70-75%.

Non-reassuring CTG findings during labour can indicate maternal or foetal compromise and require prompt action. Examples of abnormal findings include bradycardia, tachycardia, reduced variability, or prolonged deceleration. If these findings persist, the best course of action is to prepare for a category 2 caesarean section, which is for non-life-threatening maternal or foetal compromise. Augmenting contractions with syntocinon infusion is not recommended, as there is no evidence of its benefit. Increasing the frequency of CTG checks is not the best action, as the definitive action needed is to plan delivery. Tocolysis and a category 3 caesarean section are also not recommended, as they do not resolve the issue quickly enough. Foetal blood sampling is not routinely performed for non-reassuring CTG findings, but may be indicated for abnormal CTG findings to determine the health of the foetus.

Caesarean Section: Types, Indications, and Risks

Caesarean section, also known as C-section, is a surgical procedure that involves delivering a baby through an incision in the mother’s abdomen and uterus. In recent years, the rate of C-section has increased significantly due to an increased fear of litigation. There are two main types of C-section: lower segment C-section, which comprises 99% of cases, and classic C-section, which involves a longitudinal incision in the upper segment of the uterus.

C-section may be indicated for various reasons, including absolute cephalopelvic disproportion, placenta praevia grades 3/4, pre-eclampsia, post-maturity, IUGR, fetal distress in labor/prolapsed cord, failure of labor to progress, malpresentations, placental abruption, vaginal infection, and cervical cancer. The urgency of C-section may be categorized into four categories, with Category 1 being the most urgent and Category 4 being elective.

It is important for clinicians to inform women of the serious and frequent risks associated with C-section, including emergency hysterectomy, need for further surgery, admission to intensive care unit, thromboembolic disease, bladder injury, ureteric injury, and death. C-section may also increase the risk of uterine rupture, antepartum stillbirth, placenta praevia, and placenta accreta in subsequent pregnancies. Other complications may include persistent wound and abdominal discomfort, increased risk of repeat C-section, readmission to hospital, haemorrhage, infection, and fetal lacerations.

Vaginal birth after C-section (VBAC) may be an appropriate method of delivery for pregnant women with a single previous C-section delivery, except for those with previous uterine rupture or classical C-section scar. The success rate of VBAC is around 70-75%.

A complete miscarriage occurs when the entire fetus is spontaneously aborted and expelled through the cervix. Once the fetus has been expelled, the pain and uterine contractions typically cease. An ultrasound can confirm that the uterus is now empty.

Miscarriage is a common complication that can occur in up to 25% of all pregnancies. There are different types of miscarriage, each with its own set of symptoms and characteristics. Threatened miscarriage is painless vaginal bleeding that occurs before 24 weeks, typically at 6-9 weeks. The bleeding is usually less than menstruation, and the cervical os is closed. Missed or delayed miscarriage is when a gestational sac containing a dead fetus is present before 20 weeks, without the symptoms of expulsion. The mother may experience light vaginal bleeding or discharge, and the symptoms of pregnancy may disappear. Pain is not usually a feature, and the cervical os is closed. Inevitable miscarriage is characterized by heavy bleeding with clots and pain, and the cervical os is open. Incomplete miscarriage occurs when not all products of conception have been expelled, and there is pain and vaginal bleeding. The cervical os is open in this type of miscarriage.

There is no need to increase the dose of medication as the patient’s epilepsy is well controlled on the current regimen. Switching from carbamazepine to lamotrigine is also unnecessary and not safer.

Pregnancy and breastfeeding can be a concern for women with epilepsy. It is generally recommended that women continue taking their medication during pregnancy, as the risks of uncontrolled seizures outweigh the potential risks to the fetus. However, it is important for women to take folic acid before pregnancy to reduce the risk of neural tube defects. The use of antiepileptic medication during pregnancy can increase the risk of congenital defects, but this risk is still relatively low. It is recommended to aim for monotherapy and there is no need to monitor drug levels. Sodium valproate is associated with neural tube defects, while carbamazepine is considered the least teratogenic of the older antiepileptics. Phenytoin is associated with cleft palate, and lamotrigine may require a dose increase during pregnancy. Breastfeeding is generally safe for mothers taking antiepileptics, except for barbiturates. Pregnant women taking phenytoin should be given vitamin K in the last month of pregnancy to prevent clotting disorders in the newborn.

A warning has been issued about the use of sodium valproate during pregnancy and in women of childbearing age. New evidence suggests a significant risk of neurodevelopmental delay in children following maternal use of this medication. Therefore, it should only be used if clearly necessary and under specialist neurological or psychiatric advice. It is important for women with epilepsy to discuss their options with their healthcare provider and make informed decisions about their treatment during pregnancy and breastfeeding.