Managing anticoagulation during the peri-operative period can be difficult and depends on the type of anticoagulant used and the reasons for its use. It is important to assess each patient’s risk of venous thromboembolism and bleeding. In this case, the patient has a high risk of both thromboembolic disease and bleeding due to previous CVA, known AF, and major abdominal surgery. Therefore, the best approach would be to use a shorter-acting anticoagulant such as low molecular weight heparin at a treatment dose, while withholding warfarin. The low molecular weight heparin would be stopped the night before surgery, and mechanical prophylaxis would be used.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious condition that can lead to severe health complications and even death. However, it is preventable. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has updated its guidelines for 2018 to provide recommendations for the assessment and management of patients at risk of VTE in hospital. All patients admitted to the hospital should be assessed individually to identify risk factors for VTE development and bleeding risk. The department of health’s VTE risk assessment tool is recommended for medical and surgical patients. Patients with certain risk factors, such as reduced mobility, surgery, cancer, and comorbidities, are at increased risk of developing VTE. After assessing a patient’s VTE risk, healthcare professionals should compare it to their risk of bleeding to decide whether VTE prophylaxis should be offered. If indicated, VTE prophylaxis should be started as soon as possible.

There are two types of VTE prophylaxis: mechanical and pharmacological. Mechanical prophylaxis includes anti-embolism stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression devices. Pharmacological prophylaxis includes fondaparinux sodium, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and unfractionated heparin (UFH). The choice of prophylaxis depends on the patient’s individual risk factors and bleeding risk.

In general, medical patients deemed at risk of VTE after individual assessment are started on pharmacological VTE prophylaxis, provided that the risk of VTE outweighs the risk of bleeding and there are no contraindications. Surgical patients at low risk of VTE are treated with anti-embolism stockings, while those at high risk are treated with a combination of stockings and pharmacological prophylaxis.

Patients undergoing certain surgical procedures, such as hip and knee replacements, are recommended to receive pharmacological VTE prophylaxis to reduce the risk of VTE developing post-surgery. For fragility fractures of the pelvis, hip, and proximal femur, LMWH or fondaparinux sodium is recommended for a month if the risk of VTE outweighs the risk of bleeding.

Healthcare professionals should advise patients to stop taking their combined oral contraceptive pill or hormone replacement therapy four weeks before surgery and mobilize them as soon as possible after surgery. Patients should also ensure they are hydrated. By following these guidelines, healthcare professionals can help prevent VTE and improve patient outcomes.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a serious condition that can lead to severe health complications and even death. However, it is preventable. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has updated its guidelines for 2018 to provide recommendations for the assessment and management of patients at risk of VTE in hospital. All patients admitted to the hospital should be assessed individually to identify risk factors for VTE development and bleeding risk. The department of health’s VTE risk assessment tool is recommended for medical and surgical patients. Patients with certain risk factors, such as reduced mobility, surgery, cancer, and comorbidities, are at increased risk of developing VTE. After assessing a patient’s VTE risk, healthcare professionals should compare it to their risk of bleeding to decide whether VTE prophylaxis should be offered. If indicated, VTE prophylaxis should be started as soon as possible.

There are two types of VTE prophylaxis: mechanical and pharmacological. Mechanical prophylaxis includes anti-embolism stockings and intermittent pneumatic compression devices. Pharmacological prophylaxis includes fondaparinux sodium, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), and unfractionated heparin (UFH). The choice of prophylaxis depends on the patient’s individual risk factors and bleeding risk.

In general, medical patients deemed at risk of VTE after individual assessment are started on pharmacological VTE prophylaxis, provided that the risk of VTE outweighs the risk of bleeding and there are no contraindications. Surgical patients at low risk of VTE are treated with anti-embolism stockings, while those at high risk are treated with a combination of stockings and pharmacological prophylaxis.

Patients undergoing certain surgical procedures, such as hip and knee replacements, are recommended to receive pharmacological VTE prophylaxis to reduce the risk of VTE developing post-surgery. For fragility fractures of the pelvis, hip, and proximal femur, LMWH or fondaparinux sodium is recommended for a month if the risk of VTE outweighs the risk of bleeding.

Healthcare professionals should advise patients to stop taking their combined oral contraceptive pill or hormone replacement therapy four weeks before surgery and mobilize them as soon as possible after surgery. Patients should also ensure they are hydrated. By following these guidelines, healthcare professionals can help prevent VTE and improve patient outcomes.

The first step in addressing the issue is to establish bladder drainage, which can often resolve the problem. Patients may experience a substantial diuresis and related electrolyte imbalances. It is recommended to attempt the urethral route initially.

Hydronephrosis is a condition where the kidney becomes swollen due to urine buildup. There are various causes of hydronephrosis, including pelvic-ureteric obstruction, aberrant renal vessels, calculi, tumors of the renal pelvis, stenosis of the urethra, urethral valve, prostatic enlargement, extensive bladder tumor, and retroperitoneal fibrosis. Unilateral hydronephrosis is caused by one of these factors, while bilateral hydronephrosis is caused by a combination of pelvic-ureteric obstruction, aberrant renal vessels, and tumors of the renal pelvis.

To investigate hydronephrosis, ultrasound is the first-line test to identify the presence of hydronephrosis and assess the kidneys. IVU is used to assess the position of the obstruction, while antegrade or retrograde pyelography allows for treatment. If renal colic is suspected, a CT scan is used to detect the majority of stones.

The management of hydronephrosis involves removing the obstruction and draining urine. In cases of acute upper urinary tract obstruction, a nephrostomy tube is used, while chronic upper urinary tract obstruction is treated with a ureteric stent or a pyeloplasty. The CT scan image shows a large calculus in the left ureter with accompanying hydroureter and massive hydronephrosis in the left kidney.

Overall, hydronephrosis is a serious condition that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment to prevent further complications.

To prevent the recurrence of an indirect inguinal hernia, pressure should be applied over the deep inguinal ring after reducing the hernia. This is because the hernia protrudes through the inguinal canal and covering the deep inguinal ring prevents it from reappearing during activities that increase intra-abdominal pressure, such as coughing. Noting bilateral herniae is not relevant to confirming or refuting the diagnosis, and there is no such thing as a femoral ring. If the lump reappears during coughing while covering the deep inguinal ring, it may indicate a direct hernia instead. It is important to distinguish between indirect and direct herniae during surgical repair, as they occur in different locations relative to the inferior epigastric blood vessels due to a hole in the internal oblique and transversus muscles.

Abdominal wall hernias occur when an organ or the fascia of an organ protrudes through the wall of the cavity that normally contains it. Risk factors for developing these hernias include obesity, ascites, increasing age, and surgical wounds. Symptoms of abdominal wall hernias include a palpable lump, cough impulse, pain, obstruction (more common in femoral hernias), and strangulation (which can compromise the bowel blood supply and lead to infarction). There are several types of abdominal wall hernias, including inguinal hernias (which account for 75% of cases and are more common in men), femoral hernias (more common in women and have a high risk of obstruction and strangulation), umbilical hernias (symmetrical bulge under the umbilicus), paraumbilical hernias (asymmetrical bulge), epigastric hernias (lump in the midline between umbilicus and xiphisternum), incisional hernias (which may occur after abdominal surgery), Spigelian hernias (rare and seen in older patients), obturator hernias (more common in females and can cause bowel obstruction), and Richter hernias (a rare type of hernia that can present with strangulation without symptoms of obstruction). In children, congenital inguinal hernias and infantile umbilical hernias are the most common types, with surgical repair recommended for the former and most resolving on their own for the latter.

Breast Cancer Risk Factors: Understanding the Predisposing Factors

Breast cancer is a complex disease that can be influenced by various factors. Some of these factors are considered predisposing factors, which means they increase the likelihood of developing breast cancer. One of the most well-known predisposing factors is the presence of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which can increase a person’s lifetime risk of breast and ovarian cancer by 40%. Other predisposing factors include having a first-degree relative with premenopausal breast cancer, nulliparity, having a first pregnancy after the age of 30, early menarche, late menopause, combined hormone replacement therapy, combined oral contraceptive use, past breast cancer, not breastfeeding, ionizing radiation, p53 gene mutations, obesity, and previous surgery for benign disease.

To reduce the risk of developing breast cancer, it is important to understand these predisposing factors and take steps to minimize their impact. For example, women with a family history of breast cancer may choose to undergo genetic testing to determine if they carry the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Women who have not yet had children may consider having their first child before the age of 30, while those who have already had children may choose to breastfeed. Additionally, women who are considering hormone replacement therapy or oral contraceptives should discuss the potential risks and benefits with their healthcare provider. By understanding these predisposing factors and taking proactive steps to reduce their impact, women can help protect themselves against breast cancer.

Diffuse axonal injury can be diagnosed most accurately through MRI scans, which are highly sensitive. To monitor the progression of contusions, repeat CT scans can be helpful. Electro-encephalograms are recommended for patients with epilepsy, while CT angiograms are useful in identifying the cause of subarachnoid hemorrhage. For detecting tumors or potential abscesses, CT scans with contrast are a valuable tool.

Types of Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury can result in primary and secondary brain injury. Primary brain injury can be focal or diffuse. Diffuse axonal injury occurs due to mechanical shearing, which causes disruption and tearing of axons. intracranial haematomas can be extradural, subdural, or intracerebral, while contusions may occur adjacent to or contralateral to the side of impact. Secondary brain injury occurs when cerebral oedema, ischaemia, infection, tonsillar or tentorial herniation exacerbates the original injury. The normal cerebral auto regulatory processes are disrupted following trauma rendering the brain more susceptible to blood flow changes and hypoxia. The Cushings reflex often occurs late and is usually a pre-terminal event.

Extradural haematoma is bleeding into the space between the dura mater and the skull. It often results from acceleration-deceleration trauma or a blow to the side of the head. The majority of epidural haematomas occur in the temporal region where skull fractures cause a rupture of the middle meningeal artery. Subdural haematoma is bleeding into the outermost meningeal layer. It most commonly occurs around the frontal and parietal lobes. Risk factors include old age, alcoholism, and anticoagulation. Subarachnoid haemorrhage classically causes a sudden occipital headache. It usually occurs spontaneously in the context of a ruptured cerebral aneurysm but may be seen in association with other injuries when a patient has sustained a traumatic brain injury. Intracerebral haematoma is a collection of blood within the substance of the brain. Causes/risk factors include hypertension, vascular lesion, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, trauma, brain tumour, or infarct. Patients will present similarly to an ischaemic stroke or with a decrease in consciousness. CT imaging will show a hyperdensity within the substance of the brain. Treatment is often conservative under the care of stroke physicians, but large clots in patients with impaired consciousness may warrant surgical evacuation.

When trauma patients experience uncontrollable bleeding in the spleen, a splenectomy may be necessary. CT imaging can be used to grade the severity of the splenic injury, with grades 1-3 typically managed conservatively if the patient is stable, and grades 4-5 often requiring surgical intervention. During emergency laparotomy, if certain findings such as uncontrollable bleeding, hilar vascular injuries, or a devascularized spleen are present, a splenectomy may be indicated.

Managing Splenic Trauma

The spleen is a commonly injured intra-abdominal organ, but in most cases, it can be conserved. The management of splenic trauma depends on several factors, including associated injuries, haemodynamic status, and the extent of direct splenic injury.

Conservative management is appropriate for small subcapsular haematomas, minimal intra-abdominal blood, and no hilar disruption. However, if there are increased amounts of intra-abdominal blood, moderate haemodynamic compromise, or tears or lacerations affecting less than 50%, laparotomy with conservation may be necessary.

In cases of hilar injuries, major haemorrhage, or major associated injuries, resection is the preferred management option. It is important to note that the management approach should be tailored to the individual patient’s needs and circumstances. Proper management of splenic trauma can help prevent further complications and improve patient outcomes.

Cholangitis can occur even in the absence of stones, although they are commonly associated with the condition. ERCP can be used to drain the biliary tree, but surgical exploration of the common bile duct may be necessary in certain cases.

Understanding Ascending Cholangitis

Ascending cholangitis is a bacterial infection that affects the biliary tree, with E. coli being the most common culprit. This condition is often associated with gallstones, which can predispose individuals to the infection. Patients with ascending cholangitis may present with Charcot’s triad, which includes fever, right upper quadrant pain, and jaundice. However, this triad is only present in 20-50% of cases. Other common symptoms include hypotension and confusion. In severe cases, Reynolds’ pentad may be observed, which includes the additional symptoms of hypotension and confusion.

To diagnose ascending cholangitis, ultrasound is typically used as a first-line investigation to look for bile duct dilation and stones. Raised inflammatory markers may also be observed. Treatment involves intravenous antibiotics and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after 24-48 hours to relieve any obstruction.

Overall, ascending cholangitis is a serious condition that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. Understanding the symptoms and risk factors associated with this condition can help individuals seek medical attention early and improve their chances of a successful recovery.

The correct diagnosis for this patient is ascending cholangitis, as evidenced by the presence of Charcot’s triad of fever, jaundice, and right upper quadrant pain. This condition is commonly caused by gallstones and is often seen in individuals with recurrent biliary colic. It is important to note that acute cholangitis is a medical emergency and requires immediate treatment with antibiotics and preparation for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP).

Acute cholecystitis is a possible differential diagnosis, but it is less likely in this case as it typically presents without jaundice. Acute pancreatitis is also a potential differential, but it is characterized by epigastric pain that radiates to the back and is relieved by sitting up. A serum amylase or lipase test can help differentiate between the two conditions. Biliary colic is another possible diagnosis, but the presence of secondary infective signs and jaundice suggest a complication of gallstones, such as cholangitis.

Understanding Ascending Cholangitis

Ascending cholangitis is a bacterial infection that affects the biliary tree, with E. coli being the most common culprit. This condition is often associated with gallstones, which can predispose individuals to the infection. Patients with ascending cholangitis may present with Charcot’s triad, which includes fever, right upper quadrant pain, and jaundice. However, this triad is only present in 20-50% of cases. Other common symptoms include hypotension and confusion. In severe cases, Reynolds’ pentad may be observed, which includes the additional symptoms of hypotension and confusion.

To diagnose ascending cholangitis, ultrasound is typically used as a first-line investigation to look for bile duct dilation and stones. Raised inflammatory markers may also be observed. Treatment involves intravenous antibiotics and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after 24-48 hours to relieve any obstruction.

Overall, ascending cholangitis is a serious condition that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. Understanding the symptoms and risk factors associated with this condition can help individuals seek medical attention early and improve their chances of a successful recovery.

Although amylase is useful in diagnosing acute pancreatitis, it does not provide any prognostic information. Therefore, it is only useful for diagnosis. In this patient’s case, his symptoms, history of alcohol excess, and significantly elevated serum amylase strongly support a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. However, cross-sectional imaging may be necessary to confirm the diagnosis. It is important to note that serum lipase is a more sensitive and specific diagnostic test for acute pancreatitis, particularly in cases of alcohol-induced pancreatitis.

Understanding Acute Pancreatitis

Acute pancreatitis is a condition that is commonly caused by alcohol or gallstones. It occurs when the pancreatic enzymes start to digest the pancreatic tissue, leading to necrosis. The main symptom of acute pancreatitis is severe epigastric pain that may radiate through to the back. Vomiting is also common, and examination may reveal epigastric tenderness, ileus, and low-grade fever. In rare cases, periumbilical discolouration (Cullen’s sign) and flank discolouration (Grey-Turner’s sign) may be present.

To diagnose acute pancreatitis, doctors typically measure the levels of serum amylase and lipase in the blood. While amylase is raised in 75% of patients, it does not correlate with disease severity. Lipase, on the other hand, is more sensitive and specific than amylase and has a longer half-life. Imaging tests, such as ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT, may also be used to assess the aetiology of the condition.

Scoring systems, such as the Ranson score, Glasgow score, and APACHE II, are used to identify cases of severe pancreatitis that may require intensive care management. Factors that indicate severe pancreatitis include age over 55 years, hypocalcaemia, hyperglycaemia, hypoxia, neutrophilia, and elevated LDH and AST. It is important to note that the actual amylase level is not of prognostic value.

In summary, acute pancreatitis is a condition that can cause severe pain and discomfort. It is typically caused by alcohol or gallstones and can be diagnosed through blood tests and imaging. Scoring systems are used to identify cases of severe pancreatitis that require intensive care management.

According to the GMC guidelines in Good Medical Practice, it is important to offer patients the option of having an impartial observer (a chaperone) present during intimate examinations. This applies regardless of the gender of the patient or doctor. The chaperone should be a health professional who is sensitive, respectful of the patient’s dignity and confidentiality, familiar with the procedures involved, and able to stay for the entire examination. If the patient requests a relative or friend to be present, this person should not be considered an impartial observer. If either the patient or doctor is uncomfortable with the choice of chaperone, the examination can be delayed until a suitable chaperone is available, as long as this does not adversely affect the patient’s health. The patient’s clinical needs should always take precedence. It is important to document any discussions about chaperones and their outcomes in the patient’s medical record. In the case of a breast lump examination, it would be unreasonable to make the patient wait for two weeks, so offering a chaperone or rescheduling the appointment would be necessary. It is not appropriate to perform the examination without a chaperone or with the patient’s mother as the chaperone.

Benign breast lesions have different features and treatments. Fibroadenomas are firm, mobile lumps that develop from a whole lobule and usually do not increase the risk of malignancy. Breast cysts are smooth, discrete lumps that may be aspirated, but blood-stained or persistently refilling cysts should be biopsied or excised. Sclerosing adenosis, radial scars, and complex sclerosing lesions cause mammographic changes that may mimic carcinoma, but do not increase the risk of malignancy. Epithelial hyperplasia may present as general lumpiness or a discrete lump, and atypical features and family history of breast cancer increase the risk of malignancy. Fat necrosis may mimic carcinoma and requires imaging and core biopsy. Duct papillomas usually present with nipple discharge and may require microdochectomy.

It is not recommended to manually reduce strangulated inguinal hernias while awaiting surgery. In the scenario of a patient with an acute abdomen and signs of a strangulated hernia, the appropriate response is to call 999 for urgent assessment and inform the surgical registrar on-call. Attempting to manually reduce the hernia can worsen the patient’s condition. Requesting a urine sample or discussing an appendicectomy is not appropriate in this situation.

Understanding Strangulated Inguinal Hernias

An inguinal hernia occurs when abdominal contents protrude through the superficial inguinal ring. This can happen directly through the deep inguinal ring or indirectly through the posterior wall of the inguinal canal. Hernias should be reducible, meaning that the herniated tissue can be pushed back into place in the abdomen through the defect using a hand. However, if a hernia cannot be reduced, it is referred to as an incarcerated hernia, which is at risk of strangulation. Strangulation is a surgical emergency where the blood supply to the herniated tissue is compromised, leading to ischemia or necrosis.

Symptoms of a strangulated hernia include pain, fever, an increase in the size of a hernia or erythema of the overlying skin, peritonitic features such as guarding and localised tenderness, bowel obstruction, and bowel ischemia. Imaging can be used in cases of suspected strangulation, but it is not considered necessary and is more useful in excluding other pathologies. Repair involves immediate surgery, either from an open or laparoscopic approach with a mesh technique. This is the same technique used in elective hernia repair, however, any dead bowel will also have to be removed. While waiting for the surgery, it is not recommended that you manually reduce strangulated hernias, as this can cause more generalised peritonitis. Strangulation occurs in around 1 in 500 cases of all inguinal hernias, and indications that a hernia is at risk of strangulation include episodes of pain in a hernia that was previously asymptomatic and irreducible hernias.

This patient is experiencing neurogenic shock, which is a type of distributive shock. As a result, the patient’s peripheries will feel warm due to peripheral vasodilation. Neurogenic shock occurs when the autonomic nervous system is interrupted, leading to a decrease in sympathetic tone or an increase in parasympathetic tone. This causes marked vasodilation and a decrease in peripheral vascular resistance, resulting in warm peripheries. Unlike other types of shock, administering intravenous fluids will not improve the patient’s blood pressure. Anaphylactic shock, cardiogenic shock, and hemorrhagic shock are not the correct diagnoses for this patient. Anaphylactic shock is caused by exposure to an allergen, which is not present in this case. Cardiogenic shock is characterized by circulatory collapse and cool peripheries, while hemorrhagic shock causes vasoconstriction and cool peripheries to preserve blood volume. Additionally, the patient’s blood pressure did not improve after fluid resuscitation, making neurogenic shock a more likely diagnosis.

Understanding Shock: Aetiology and Management

Shock is a condition that occurs when there is inadequate tissue perfusion. It can be caused by various factors, including sepsis, haemorrhage, neurogenic injury, cardiogenic events, and anaphylaxis. Septic shock is a major concern, with a mortality rate of over 40% in patients with severe sepsis. Haemorrhagic shock is often seen in trauma patients, and the severity is classified based on the amount of blood loss and associated physiological changes. Neurogenic shock occurs following spinal cord injury, leading to decreased peripheral vascular resistance and cardiac output. Cardiogenic shock is commonly caused by ischaemic heart disease or direct myocardial trauma. Anaphylactic shock is a severe hypersensitivity reaction that can be life-threatening.

The management of shock depends on the underlying cause. In septic shock, prompt administration of antibiotics and haemodynamic stabilisation are crucial. In haemorrhagic shock, controlling bleeding and maintaining circulating volume are essential. In neurogenic shock, peripheral vasoconstrictors are used to restore vascular tone. In cardiogenic shock, supportive treatment and surgery may be required. In anaphylactic shock, adrenaline is the most important drug and should be given as soon as possible.

Understanding the aetiology and management of shock is crucial for healthcare professionals to provide timely and appropriate interventions to improve patient outcomes.

If a young man presents with symptoms of acute prostatitis, it is important to test for sexually transmitted infections (STIs). This is because while Escherichia coli is the most common cause of acute prostatitis, STIs such as Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae can also be responsible, especially in younger men. Testing for other conditions such as measuring PSA or testing for HIV would not be appropriate in this case. Biopsy of the prostate is also not indicated for acute prostatitis, but may be useful in chronic cases.

Acute bacterial prostatitis is a condition that occurs when gram-negative bacteria enter the prostate gland through the urethra. The most common pathogen responsible for this condition is Escherichia coli. Risk factors for acute bacterial prostatitis include recent urinary tract infection, urogenital instrumentation, intermittent bladder catheterisation, and recent prostate biopsy. Symptoms of this condition include pain in various areas such as the perineum, penis, rectum, or back, obstructive voiding symptoms, fever, and rigors. A tender and boggy prostate gland can be detected during a digital rectal examination.

The recommended treatment for acute bacterial prostatitis is a 14-day course of a quinolone. It is also advisable to consider screening for sexually transmitted infections.

Osteochondroma: The Most Common Skeletal Neoplasm

Osteochondroma, also known as osteocartilaginous exostosis, is a prevalent type of benign bone tumor. It accounts for 20-50% of all benign bone tumors and 10-15% of all bone tumors. This type of tumor is characterized by a cartilage-capped subperiosteal bone projection. Osteochondromas are most commonly found in the first two decades of life, with a male to female ratio of 1.5:1.

The most common location for osteochondromas is in long bones, particularly around the knee, with 40% of the tumors occurring in the distal femur and proximal tibia. Despite being benign, osteochondromas can cause complications such as nerve compression, vascular compromise, and skeletal deformities. Therefore, early detection and treatment are crucial to prevent further complications.

If an aneurysm is rapidly enlarging, regardless of its size, it should be repaired even if there are no symptoms present. In the case of this patient, their AAA has grown from a small aneurysm to a medium-sized one, which would typically require ultrasound screening every three months. However, since the aneurysm has grown more than 1 cm in the past year, it is considered rapidly enlarging and requires referral for surgical repair within two weeks. Urgent surgical repair is only necessary if there is suspicion of a ruptured AAA. For non-rapidly enlarging, medium-sized AAAs, a repeat scan in three months is recommended, while a repeat scan in six months is not necessary for any AAA case.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a condition that often develops without any symptoms. However, a ruptured AAA can be fatal, which is why it is important to screen patients for this condition. Screening involves a single abdominal ultrasound for males aged 65. The results of the screening are interpreted based on the width of the aorta. If the width is less than 3 cm, no further action is needed. If it is between 3-4.4 cm, the patient should be rescanned every 12 months. For a width of 4.5-5.4 cm, the patient should be rescanned every 3 months. If the width is 5.5 cm or more, the patient should be referred to vascular surgery within 2 weeks for probable intervention.

For patients with a low risk of rupture, which includes those with a small or medium aneurysm (i.e. aortic diameter less than 5.5 cm) and no symptoms, abdominal US surveillance should be conducted on the time-scales outlined above. Additionally, cardiovascular risk factors should be optimized, such as quitting smoking. For patients with a high risk of rupture, which includes those with a large aneurysm (i.e. aortic diameter of 5.5 cm or more) or rapidly enlarging aneurysm (more than 1 cm/year) or those with symptoms, they should be referred to vascular surgery within 2 weeks for probable intervention. Treatment for these patients may involve elective endovascular repair (EVAR) or open repair if EVAR is not suitable. EVAR involves placing a stent into the abdominal aorta via the femoral artery to prevent blood from collecting in the aneurysm. However, a complication of EVAR is an endo-leak, which occurs when the stent fails to exclude blood from the aneurysm and usually presents without symptoms on routine follow-up.

Subcutaneous emphysema is a possible finding in cases of Boerhaave’s syndrome, which involves a rupture of the oesophagus. This condition should be considered when a patient presents with chest pain, as it has a high mortality rate. The presence of subcutaneous emphysema and a history of vomiting make Boerhaave’s syndrome the most likely cause. The tear in the oesophagus allows air to travel up the mediastinum’s fascial planes and into the subcutaneous tissues, resulting in the characteristic ‘rice krispies’ crepitus.

Aortic dissection is a potential differential diagnosis for chest pain that feels like tearing. However, this type of pain typically radiates to the back, and the patient would likely have risk factors such as a connective tissue disorder, vasculitis, or trauma. The vomiting history makes aortic dissection less likely.

Mallory-Weiss tear is another possible cause of chest pain resulting from a partial-thickness tear of the oesophagus due to repeated vomiting. However, this condition would be more likely if the patient’s vomit contained blood suddenly, which is not the case in this scenario. Additionally, Mallory-Weiss tear would not present with subcutaneous emphysema as the tear is only partial thickness.

Mediastinitis is a potential complication of Boerhaave’s syndrome, which occurs when the mediastinum becomes infected. The patient would likely be systemically unwell and septic.

Myocardial infarction is another possible cause of central chest pain, but it is less likely in this case due to the vomiting history, lack of risk factors, and absence of ECG findings. Myocardial infarction would also not present with subcutaneous emphysema.

Boerhaave’s Syndrome: A Dangerous Rupture of the Oesophagus

Boerhaave’s syndrome is a serious condition that occurs when the oesophagus ruptures due to repeated episodes of vomiting. This rupture is typically located on the left side of the oesophagus and can cause sudden and severe chest pain. Patients may also experience subcutaneous emphysema, which is the presence of air under the skin of the chest wall.

To diagnose Boerhaave’s syndrome, a CT contrast swallow is typically performed. Treatment involves thoracotomy and lavage, with primary repair being feasible if surgery is performed within 12 hours of onset. If surgery is delayed beyond 12 hours, a T tube may be inserted to create a controlled fistula between the oesophagus and skin. However, delays beyond 24 hours are associated with a very high mortality rate.

Complications of Boerhaave’s syndrome can include severe sepsis, which occurs as a result of mediastinitis.

Flatus tube insertion is the primary management approach for unruptured sigmoid volvulus.

In elderly patients, sigmoid volvulus is a common condition that can be initially treated without surgery by decompressing the bowel using a flatus tube. This approach is preferred as surgery poses a higher risk in this age group. Flatus tube decompression typically leads to resolution of the volvulus without recurrence. If flatus tube decompression fails or recurrence occurs despite multiple attempts, the next step is to insert a percutaneous colostomy tube to decompress the volvulus.

Conservative management is not appropriate for patients with absolute constipation as the volvulus can become ischemic and perforate, which is associated with a high mortality rate. Anti-muscarinic agents are used to treat pseudo-obstruction, not volvulus. There is no evidence to support the need for a Hartmann’s procedure as perforation is not a concern.

Understanding Volvulus: A Condition of Twisted Colon

Volvulus is a medical condition that occurs when the colon twists around its mesenteric axis, leading to a blockage in blood flow and closed loop obstruction. Sigmoid volvulus is the most common type, accounting for around 80% of cases, and is caused by the sigmoid colon twisting on the sigmoid mesocolon. Caecal volvulus, on the other hand, occurs in around 20% of cases and is caused by the caecum twisting. This condition is more common in patients with developmental failure of peritoneal fixation of the proximal bowel.

Sigmoid volvulus is often associated with chronic constipation, Chagas disease, neurological conditions like Parkinson’s disease and Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and psychiatric conditions like schizophrenia. Caecal volvulus, on the other hand, is associated with adhesions, pregnancy, and other factors. Symptoms of volvulus include constipation, abdominal bloating, abdominal pain, and nausea/vomiting.

Diagnosis of volvulus is usually done through an abdominal film, which shows signs of large bowel obstruction alongside the coffee bean sign for sigmoid volvulus. Small bowel obstruction may be seen in caecal volvulus. Management of sigmoid volvulus involves rigid sigmoidoscopy with rectal tube insertion, while caecal volvulus usually requires operative management, with right hemicolectomy often being necessary.

Anterior resection is the preferred surgical procedure for rectal tumours, except for those located in the lower rectum. For mid to high rectal tumours, anterior resection is the usual approach. Hartmann’s procedure is typically reserved for sigmoid tumours, while abdominoperineal excision of the rectum is commonly used for anal or low rectal tumours.

Colorectal cancer is typically diagnosed through CT scans and colonoscopies or CT colonography. Patients with tumors below the peritoneal reflection should also undergo MRI to evaluate their mesorectum. Once staging is complete, a treatment plan is formulated by a dedicated colorectal MDT meeting.

For colon cancer, surgery is the primary treatment option, with resectional surgery being the only cure. The procedure is tailored to the patient and tumor location, with lymphatic chains being resected based on arterial supply. Anastomosis is the preferred method of restoring continuity, but in some cases, an end stoma may be necessary. Chemotherapy is often offered to patients with risk factors for disease recurrence.

Rectal cancer management differs from colon cancer due to the rectum’s anatomical location. Tumors can be surgically resected with either an anterior resection or an abdominoperineal excision of rectum (APER). A meticulous dissection of the mesorectal fat and lymph nodes is integral to the procedure. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy is often offered to patients prior to resectional surgery, and those with obstructing rectal cancer should have a defunctioning loop colostomy.

Segmental resections based on blood supply and lymphatic drainage are the primary operations for cancer. The type of resection and anastomosis depend on the site of cancer. In emergency situations where the bowel has perforated, an end colostomy is often safer. Left-sided resections are more risky, but ileocolic anastomoses are relatively safe even in the emergency setting and do not need to be defunctioned.

Antimuscarinic drugs are a recommended treatment for patients experiencing an overactive bladder, which is characterized by storage symptoms like urgency and frequency without any voiding symptoms. If lifestyle measures and bladder training fail to alleviate symptoms, the next step is to try an antimuscarinic agent like oxybutynin, which works by blocking contractions of the detrusor muscle. Finasteride, a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor, is not suitable for this patient as it is used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia and associated voiding symptoms. Furosemide, which increases urine production during the day and reduces it at night, is not appropriate for this patient as he does not have nocturia and it may even worsen his overactive bladder symptoms. Mirabegron, a beta-3 agonist that relaxes the detrusor muscle and increases bladder storage capacity, is a second-line medication used if antimuscarinics are not effective or well-tolerated.

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are a common issue in men over the age of 50, with benign prostatic hyperplasia being the most common cause. However, other causes such as prostate cancer should also be considered. These symptoms can be classified into three groups: voiding, storage, and post-micturition. To properly manage LUTS, it is important to conduct a urinalysis to check for infection and haematuria, perform a digital rectal examination to assess the size and consistency of the prostate, and possibly conduct a PSA test after proper counselling. Patients should also complete a urinary frequency-volume chart and an International Prostate Symptom Score to guide management.

For predominantly voiding symptoms, conservative measures such as pelvic floor muscle training, bladder training, and prudent fluid intake can be helpful. If symptoms are moderate or severe, an alpha-blocker may be offered. If the prostate is enlarged and the patient is at high risk of progression, a 5-alpha reductase inhibitor should be offered. If there are mixed symptoms of voiding and storage not responding to an alpha-blocker, an antimuscarinic drug may be added. For predominantly overactive bladder symptoms, moderating fluid intake and bladder retraining should be offered, and antimuscarinic drugs may be prescribed if symptoms persist. Mirabegron may be considered if first-line drugs fail. For nocturia, moderating fluid intake at night, furosemide 40 mg in the late afternoon, and desmopressin may be helpful.